Website review, no card needed

toto.com logo

toto.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202653 issues · 88 checks

This review found 53 issues worth fixing on toto.com, 27 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s3.4 sMay 9Oct 244.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.3 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.3 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.3 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.2 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.0 s
Sep 19, 20264.0 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.3 s
Oct 17, 20264.4 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
278 ms171 msMay 9Oct 24236 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026183 ms
May 16, 2026211 ms
May 23, 2026259 ms
May 30, 2026265 ms
Jun 6, 2026266 ms
Jun 13, 2026264 ms
Jun 20, 2026258 ms
Jun 27, 2026243 ms
Jul 4, 2026235 ms
Jul 11, 2026235 ms
Jul 18, 2026216 ms
Jul 25, 2026207 ms
Aug 1, 2026210 ms
Aug 8, 2026204 ms
Aug 15, 2026216 ms
Aug 22, 2026223 ms
Aug 29, 2026224 ms
Sep 5, 2026219 ms
Sep 12, 2026213 ms
Sep 19, 2026211 ms
Sep 26, 2026224 ms
Oct 3, 2026238 ms
Oct 10, 2026241 ms
Oct 17, 2026246 ms
Oct 24, 2026236 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of toto.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. toto.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. toto.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. toto.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. toto.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. toto.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. toto.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. toto.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  8. toto.com at 6.8 s6.8 s

Speed

9 to fix9
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.3 s · 3.5 MB

    65 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    5.1 s · 2.9 MB

    27 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.0 s · 957 KiB

    About 957 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.8 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 2.1 s of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 9

    9/100

    Your mobile performance score is 9 (desktop: 21). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and jQuery CDN and others), adding 2.4 MB and 2.4 s of main-thread time.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 251 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 77 KiB

    About 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    81 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    17 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Real visitors wait 6.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.61

    0.61

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.61 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 31.9 s

    31.9 s

    Your largest element takes 31.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to improve your experience on our website, t…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 32.9 s

    32.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 32.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.9 s

    13.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.529

    0.529

    The layout shifts by 0.529 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 236 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 43 images without width and height

    43 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 169 ms

    169 ms

    Real visitors wait 169 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 6.2 MB in 174 requests

    6.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 174 requests on a phone: images 3.3 MB (61), scripts 2.4 MB (39) and fonts 195 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    kv_purpose_bg_202604.png weighs 837 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 25 images in older formats

    25 images (3.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    188 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example img-pro-shower.jpg at 832 px wide, shown at 195 px. Resized copies would save about 188 KiB.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.76 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.76 g of CO₂e: 210.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8288
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 6272
  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “TOTO GLOBAL SITE”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (172 characters)

    Your meta description is 172 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at toto.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 90 internal links, 61 external

    The homepage links to 90 pages on toto.com and 61 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.toto.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.toto.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix81
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.toto.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (471 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 3 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.toto.com/en/corporate, https://www.toto.com/en/cleanovation and https://www.toto.com/en/press declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.toto.com/en/index.htm and / all use the title “TOTO GLOBAL SITE”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.toto.com/en/washletplus has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    / and https://www.toto.com/en/experiencetoto use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.toto.com/en/neorest/pure_luxury/collections/flotationtub has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 219 words

    The homepage has only about 219 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at toto.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 53 issues on toto.com, including 22 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25