Website review, no card needed
traders-trust.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202638 issues · 77 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on traders-trust.com, 16 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
57FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 507 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 514 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 534 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 538 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 541 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 525 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 522 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 516 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 509 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 490 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 493 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 507 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 514 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 529 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 543 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 540 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 547 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 551 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 529 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 526 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 524 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 530 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 557 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 579 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 599 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.3 s
3.5 s
4.6 s
5.8 s
6.9 s
8.1 s
9.2 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 721 KiBAbout 721 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 888 KiB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (888 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 22
22/100Your mobile performance score is 22 (desktop: 41). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.4 s
A phone's processor spends 5.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and LiveChat and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 787 ms
787 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 787 ms of main-thread work and 670 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
450 ms · 12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 400 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
371 KiB8 images could be 371 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Facebook adds 315 ms
315 msFacebook costs a phone 315 ms of main-thread work and 212 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,771 HTML elements
The page has 1,771 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
LiveChat adds 87 ms
87 msLiveChat costs a phone 87 ms of main-thread work and 366 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.4 s
6.4 sReal visitors wait 6.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 653 ms
653 msReal visitors wait 653 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.36
0.36For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.36 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.9 s
16.9 sYour largest element takes 16.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “MetaTrader 4 — Official example interface”.
Speed Index: 13.2 s
13.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 18.1 s
18.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.384
0.384The layout shifts by 0.384 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 507 ms to 599 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 6.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.1 MB in 154 requests
3.1 MBYour homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 154 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (73), images 797 KiB (35) and fonts 71 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.88 g of CO₂e: 105.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 33 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “Traders Trust - Forex Trading”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://traders-trust.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
8 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 8 pages on traders-trust.com and 0 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “Trade Forex and CFDs with Traders Trust. Enjoy up to 1:3000 leverage, ultra-tight spreads from 0.0 pips, and 24/5 suppo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Home”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://traders-trust.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://traders-trust.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://traders-trust.com/en/open-account, whose canonical is https://traders-trust.com/open-account. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page with very little text
https://traders-trust.com/en/open-account has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 internal page checked
We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=761735350200022&ev=PageView&noscript=1.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 10 words
The homepage has only about 10 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Try Demo Account”, “Try Free Demo” and “Start Trading”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at traders-trust.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on traders-trust.com, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.