Website review, no card needed
trafalgar.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202639 issues · 96 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on trafalgar.com, 20 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 270 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 270 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 352 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 362 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.7 s
2.6 s
3.5 s
4.3 s
5.2 s
6.1 s
6.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.4 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.6 s
1.6 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 873 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.4 s
A phone's processor spends 7.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,454 HTML elements
The page has 3,454 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and decagon.ai and others), adding 2.5 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 688 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (688 KiB).
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 800 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Cookiebot adds 713 ms
713 msCookiebot costs a phone 713 ms of main-thread work and 40 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 110 KiBAbout 110 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
decagon.ai adds 284 ms
284 msdecagon.ai costs a phone 284 ms of main-thread work and 699 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Feefo.com adds 53 ms
53 msFeefo.com costs a phone 53 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
226 KiB12 images could be 226 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
64 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 64 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 40 ms
40 msYour server sent the HTML in 40 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.8 s
15.8 sYour largest element takes 15.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Budapest skyline in Hungary with a bridge over the Danube R…”.
Time to Interactive: 34.4 s
34.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.9 s
2.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 448 ms
448 msReal visitors wait 448 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors
+32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 270 ms to 362 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.077
0.077The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.077, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 218 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 218 requests on a phone: scripts 3.7 MB (99), fonts 777 KiB (8) and images 713 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.57 g of CO₂e: 189.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
26 tap targets too small
26 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links must have discernible text (16 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (3 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (129 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 129 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 111 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
107 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 107 pages on trafalgar.com and 13 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 157 characters
Your meta description is 157 characters: “Book tours and travel packages with Trafalgar. A small deposit secures your vacation, and if you need to cancel, you'll…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Worldwide Group Tours & European River Cruises”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Tour Packages & Travel Vacations | Trafalgar Tours US”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.trafalgar.com/en-us.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, Product and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trafalgar.com/en-us/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.trafalgar.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, description and contact details; logo and sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,414 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.trafalgar.com/en-gb/small-groups, https://www.trafalgar.com/en-gb/deals/loyalty and https://www.trafalgar.com/en-gb/resources/travel-flexibility took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
19 small tap targets
19 of 41 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Framing 'https://consentcdn.cookiebot.com/' violates the following report-only Content Security Policy directive: "fram…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,085 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,085 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Call 8665131995”.
26 calls to action
The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Get a Quote” and “Call 8665131995”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trafalgar.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on trafalgar.com, including 24 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.