Website review, no card needed

tryolabs.com logo

tryolabs.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 81 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on tryolabs.com, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s2.9 sApr 25Oct 103.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.5 s
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20264.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20264.1 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
494 ms297 msApr 25Oct 10421 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026328 ms
May 2, 2026378 ms
May 9, 2026371 ms
May 16, 2026378 ms
May 23, 2026363 ms
May 30, 2026353 ms
Jun 6, 2026356 ms
Jun 13, 2026356 ms
Jun 20, 2026356 ms
Jun 27, 2026328 ms
Jul 4, 2026328 ms
Jul 11, 2026328 ms
Jul 18, 2026320 ms
Jul 25, 2026320 ms
Aug 1, 2026333 ms
Aug 8, 2026408 ms
Aug 15, 2026413 ms
Aug 22, 2026448 ms
Aug 29, 2026456 ms
Sep 5, 2026436 ms
Sep 12, 2026471 ms
Sep 19, 2026436 ms
Sep 26, 2026428 ms
Oct 3, 2026428 ms
Oct 10, 2026421 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tryolabs.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tryolabs.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  2. tryolabs.com at 8.8 s8.8 s
  3. tryolabs.com at 13.1 s13.1 s
  4. tryolabs.com at 17.5 s17.5 s
  5. tryolabs.com at 21.9 s21.9 s
  6. tryolabs.com at 26.3 s26.3 s
  7. tryolabs.com at 30.6 s30.6 s
  8. tryolabs.com at 35.0 s35.0 s

Speed

8 to fix25
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.7 s · 680 KiB

    About 680 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 41.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 41.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 1.7 MB and 822 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 93 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (93 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 500 ms

    500 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 500 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 537 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • JSDelivr CDN adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    JSDelivr CDN costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 542 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    140 ms · 63 KiB

    About 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    86 KiB

    4 images could be 86 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 68 ms

    68 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 68 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.0 s

    22.0 s

    Your largest element takes 22.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “AI and data consulting for enterprises. We partner with you…”.

  • Speed Index: 22.8 s

    22.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 22.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 6.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.2 s

    40.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 421 ms

    421 ms

    Real visitors wait 421 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 328 ms to 421 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 972 ms

    972 ms

    Real visitors wait 972 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 83 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 83 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (34), fonts 975 KiB (7) and other files 908 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (84 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 126.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8288
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (5 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (48 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 48 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h3 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“EngineeringDeployingScalingEngineeringEngineering” and “AI built for your business”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 40 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 40 pages on tryolabs.com and 29 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Tryolabs is a specialized AI and machine learning solutions company that helps companies create business value by partn…”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “AI & Machine Learning Consulting | Tryolabs”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tryolabs.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tryolabs.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (484 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /customers/mercadolibre and /customers/allianz-gi use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /newsroom/qubika-acquires-tryolabs, /contact, /customers/mercadolibre, /customers/halliburton, /blog/releasing-maskcam-an-open-source-smart-camera-based-around-jetson-nano and /customers/allianz-gi have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    45 of 45 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 407 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 407 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Book a call with us” and “Learn more”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tryolabs.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Netlify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on tryolabs.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25