Website review, no card needed
turingcollege.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202630 issues · 84 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on turingcollege.com, 10 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 239 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.3 s
1.9 s
2.6 s
3.2 s
3.9 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.0 s · 970 KiBAbout 970 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 341 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (341 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 67). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.6 s
A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 505 ms
505 msYouTube costs a phone 505 ms of main-thread work and 970 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 111 KiBAbout 111 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 71 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 71 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 402 ms
402 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 372 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 325 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
297 KiB15 images could be 297 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 67 but mobile only 36. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.1 s
17.1 sYour largest element takes 17.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Karolina Miniotaitė”.
Time to Interactive: 21.5 s
21.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sThe first text or image appears after 6.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 896 ms
896 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 896 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 199 ms to 239 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
37 images without width and height
37 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 178 ms
178 msReal visitors wait 178 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 443 ms
443 msReal visitors wait 443 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 59% faster for real visitors
-59%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 163 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 163 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (68), images 786 KiB (45) and HTML 113 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
215 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 672b8ae7596cdbf5b0f14b38_badge-coursereport.png at 842 px wide, shown at 111 px. Resized copies would save about 215 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (338 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images in older formats
2 images (315 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.00 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 119.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 209 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
39 internal links, 30 external
The homepage links to 39 pages on turingcollege.com and 30 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “Join Turing College for top online courses designed for busy professionals. Learn in-demand skills in programming, mark…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Learn new tech skills.”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Turing College - Top Online Courses For Busy People”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.turingcollege.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.turingcollege.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,452 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.turingcollege.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 25 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,598 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,598 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join affiliate programme” and “Learn more”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Join affiliate programme” and “Apply now”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 20 testimonial or review blocks, 2 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 5 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Heap and Hotjar and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
35 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at turingcollege.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Vercel
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on turingcollege.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.