Website review, no card needed
tus.si website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202643 issues · 91 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on tus.si, 22 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #71,586 of 92,176 reviewed websitesbeats 19%
- #41,551 of 48,904 online storesbeats 12%
- #1,464 of 2,197 WooCommerce storesbeats 29%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
14.7 s · 4.3 MB72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
7.1 s · 2.3 MB15 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.9 s44 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 438 KiBAbout 438 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 23). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 225 KiBAbout 225 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 274 ms
274 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 274 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and New Relic and others), adding 848 KiB and 370 ms of main-thread time.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 26 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 130 ms
130 msYour server sent the HTML in 130 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.60
0.60For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.3 s
26.3 sYour largest element takes 26.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PREKLOPI NA DIGITALNI RAČUN Namesto papirnatih računov prej…”.
Time to Interactive: 26.4 s
26.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.524
0.524The layout shifts by 0.524 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
25 images without width and height
25 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 230 ms
230 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 230 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 734 ms
734 msReal visitors wait 734 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.2 MB in 106 requests
5.2 MBYour homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 106 requests on a phone: images 3.5 MB (25), scripts 992 KiB (48) and fonts 415 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images in older formats
4 images (694 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (124 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 175.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
13 images without alt text
13 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
157 internal links, 36 external
The homepage links to 157 pages on tus.si and 36 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 126 characters
Your meta description is 126 characters: “Spoštujemo kakovostne izdelke lokalnih dobaviteljev. Tuš - vaš slovenski trgovec. Vedno boljši. Ponudba: Tuš klub ugodn…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “V Tušu vsak dan skrbimo za pestro ponudbo, ugodne cene in nakupe, prilagojene vašim potrebam.”.
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Spletna trgovina, akcijska ponudba, kuponi, delovni časi | tus.si”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tus.si/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Person, Place and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tus.si/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tus.si/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,179 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.tus.si/aktualno/akcijska-ponudba/mojih-10 has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.tus.si/drogerija, https://www.tus.si/zabava and https://www.tus.si/nepremicnine have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
26 small tap targets
26 of 64 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 777 words of copy
The homepage carries about 777 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tus.si, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1989
- Headquarters
- Celje
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on tus.si, including 18 speed issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.