tutorialspoint.com website review

A phone's processor spends 12.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Improve Digital, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Pubmatic and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

71 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (875 KiB).

Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

About 561 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

Improve Digital costs a phone 353 ms of main-thread work and 564 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 235 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

The page has 2,302 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 182 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

1 image could be 37 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

The page becomes fully interactive after 25.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 607 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Real visitors wait 256 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Your largest element takes 2.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 224 ms to 224 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 853 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (59), other files 424 KiB (480) and images 364 KiB (217). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

1 dropdown has no label.

20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 80 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

The homepage links to 206 pages on tutorialspoint.com and 26 external pages.

Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

There is no https://www.tutorialspoint.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

robots.txt blocks GPTBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.tutorialspoint.com/practice/index.htm, whose canonical is https://www.tutorialspoint.com/practice. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/practice/index.htm has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/whiteboard.htm has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 179 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

49 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.

Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 1,152 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 61 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.