Website review, no card needed

tutlo.com logo

tutlo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202646 issues · 88 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on tutlo.com, 18 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
522 ms270 msMay 9Oct 24459 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026303 ms
May 16, 2026303 ms
May 23, 2026299 ms
May 30, 2026309 ms
Jun 6, 2026350 ms
Jun 13, 2026407 ms
Jun 20, 2026456 ms
Jun 27, 2026487 ms
Jul 4, 2026493 ms
Jul 11, 2026492 ms
Jul 18, 2026489 ms
Jul 25, 2026481 ms
Aug 1, 2026479 ms
Aug 8, 2026481 ms
Aug 15, 2026479 ms
Aug 22, 2026480 ms
Aug 29, 2026470 ms
Sep 5, 2026462 ms
Sep 12, 2026456 ms
Sep 19, 2026454 ms
Sep 26, 2026456 ms
Oct 3, 2026455 ms
Oct 10, 2026457 ms
Oct 17, 2026459 ms
Oct 24, 2026459 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tutlo.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tutlo.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. tutlo.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. tutlo.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. tutlo.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. tutlo.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. tutlo.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. tutlo.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. tutlo.com at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

9 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 51). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 948 KiB

    About 948 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 547 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (547 KiB).

  • Font display

    600 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 487 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,321 HTML elements

    The page has 2,321 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Bing Ads and Cloudflare and others), adding 172 KiB and 231 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    91 KiB

    4 images could be 91 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 509 ms

    509 ms

    Real visitors wait 509 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.4 s

    19.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Poznaj nowoczesne podejście do nauki języka, które dopasowu…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).

  • Tap response (INP) got 51% slower for real visitors

    +51%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 303 ms to 459 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03

    0.03

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 106 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 106 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (25), images 444 KiB (55) and fonts 222 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 91.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8488
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Angielski Online - Kursy i nauka języka angielskiego | Szkoła Tutlo”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 70 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 70 pages on tutlo.com and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Nauka angielskiego online w Tutlo ☛ kursy języka angielskiego z native speakerem lub polskim lektorem ➤ Dołącz do tysię…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Nauka angielskiego online – kursy języka angielskiego w Tutlo”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tutlo.com/pl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tutlo.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,617 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://tutlo.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 23 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://tutlo.com/pl/angielski-dla-dzieci is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://tutlo.com/pl/nasza-metoda and https://tutlo.com/pl/blog have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://tutlo.com/angielski-dla-dzieci/cennik, whose canonical is https://tutlo.com/pl/indywidualna-wycena-kursu-angielskiego-dla-dzieci. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://tutlo.com/pl/kontakt and https://tutlo.com/pl/blog have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7770
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://tutlo.com/pl/.

  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Authorization will not be covered by the wildcard symbol (*) in CORS `Access-Control-Allow-Headers`…”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '<'”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,142 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,142 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tutlo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on tutlo.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
tutlo.com website review: scores and fixes | Programmable