Website review, no card needed
ubalt.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202640 issues · 85 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on ubalt.edu, 18 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 165 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 204 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.0 s · 13.7 MB21 images could be 13.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 716 KiBAbout 716 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 947 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
407 KiB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (407 KiB).
Facebook adds 277 ms
277 msFacebook costs a phone 277 ms of main-thread work and 254 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 257 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Document request latency
63 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused CSS
55 KiBAbout 55 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 32 ms
32 msYour server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.1 s
5.1 sReal visitors wait 5.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 46.0 s
46.0 sYour largest element takes 46.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Seth, a UBalt student, leans against a pool table while pos…”.
Time to Interactive: 51.8 s
51.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 51.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.2 s
12.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 958 ms
958 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 958 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.247
0.247The layout shifts by 0.247 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user INP: 195 ms
195 msReal visitors wait 195 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 18.1 MB in 181 requests
18.1 MBYour homepage downloads 18.1 MB in 181 requests on a phone: images 15.8 MB (50), scripts 1.8 MB (44) and fonts 228 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images over 500 KB
10 images weigh 11.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images far larger than shown
5.5 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example homepage_pathways_design.jpg at 2,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 5.5 MB.
22 images in older formats
22 images (15.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (8.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.1 g of CO₂ per visit
5.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.14 g of CO₂e: 616.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 43 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (27 characters)
Your title is only 27 characters: “The University of Baltimore”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (356 characters)
Your meta description is 356 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
99 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 99 pages on ubalt.edu and 8 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Different By Design”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ubalt.edu/index.cfm.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ubalt.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ubalt.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (939 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.ubalt.edu/academics/academic-libraries/index.cfm and https://www.ubalt.edu/academics/early-college-initiatives/index.cfm have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.ubalt.edu/admission-and-aid/undergraduate-admissions/index.cfm and https://www.ubalt.edu/admission-and-aid/transfer-admissions/index.cfm took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 70 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not defined”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 292 words of copy
The homepage carries about 292 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Apply for Readmission”, “Apply” and “Request Information”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks and 2 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ubalt.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Ums2
Company
- Employees
- 761
- Founded
- 1925
- Headquarters
- Baltimore
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on ubalt.edu, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.