Website review, no card needed
ues.com.uy website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202650 issues · 90 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on ues.com.uy, 22 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 213 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 207 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 259 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
21.0 s · 3.4 MBAbout 3.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 21.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
13.6 s · 6.5 MB63 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
8.7 s · 2.3 MB21 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.8 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.
Reduce unused CSS
3.0 s · 458 KiBAbout 458 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 2.8 s
2.8 sYouTube costs a phone 2.8 s of main-thread work and 4.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.3 s
A phone's processor spends 9.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.8 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 644 ms
644 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 644 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 449 ms
449 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 449 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 350 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 45 KiB45 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Document request latency
37 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 72 ms
72 msYour server sent the HTML in 72 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 55.3 s
55.3 sYour largest element takes 55.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Seleccione una opción de rastreo El número de guía podrá se…”.
Speed Index: 19.6 s
19.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 63.4 s
63.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 63.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 320 ms
320 msReal visitors wait 320 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 213 ms to 259 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
33 images without width and height
33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 737 ms
737 msReal visitors wait 737 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013
0.013The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.9 MB in 177 requests
13.9 MBYour homepage downloads 13.9 MB in 177 requests on a phone: scripts 6.1 MB (52), images 5.9 MB (50) and stylesheets 662 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
video0-img.png weighs 995 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
12 images far larger than shown
1.4 MB12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example video0-img.png at 1,552 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 1.4 MB.
21 images in older formats
21 images (2.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
19 images below the first screen load straight away
19 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit
3.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.93 g of CO₂e: 471.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (3 characters)
Your title is only 3 characters: “UES”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (50 characters)
Your meta description is only 50 characters: “La mayor empresa de servicios postales del Uruguay”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://ues.com.uy/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at ues.com.uy/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
39 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 39 pages on ues.com.uy and 5 external pages.
1 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Seleccione una opción de rastreo”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://ues.com.uy/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (920 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, https://ues.com.uy/donde_estamos.html and https://ues.com.uy/aviso.html all use the title “UES”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages share a meta description
https://ues.com.uy/nuestra_empresa.html, https://ues.com.uy/donde_estamos.html, https://ues.com.uy/faq.html, https://ues.com.uy/servicios.html, https://ues.com.uy/soluciones.html and https://ues.com.uy/uesecommerce and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages slow to respond
https://ues.com.uy/clientes.html, https://ues.com.uy/en/index.html, https://ues.com.uy/aviso.html and https://ues.com.uy/llamados_laborales.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
A 11-field form
Your longest form asks for 11 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 304 words of copy
The homepage carries about 304 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ues.com.uy, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on ues.com.uy, including 24 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.