Website review, no card needed

underoutfit.com logo

underoutfit.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202645 issues · 88 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on underoutfit.com, 12 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 49. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.6 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
197 ms168 msMay 16Oct 31194 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026179 ms
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026178 ms
Jun 6, 2026180 ms
Jun 13, 2026186 ms
Jun 20, 2026187 ms
Jun 27, 2026187 ms
Jul 4, 2026180 ms
Jul 11, 2026177 ms
Jul 18, 2026172 ms
Jul 25, 2026171 ms
Aug 1, 2026171 ms
Aug 8, 2026173 ms
Aug 15, 2026172 ms
Aug 22, 2026173 ms
Aug 29, 2026174 ms
Sep 5, 2026173 ms
Sep 12, 2026173 ms
Sep 19, 2026177 ms
Sep 26, 2026179 ms
Oct 3, 2026180 ms
Oct 10, 2026187 ms
Oct 17, 2026188 ms
Oct 24, 2026189 ms
Oct 31, 2026194 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of underoutfit.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. underoutfit.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. underoutfit.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. underoutfit.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. underoutfit.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. underoutfit.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. underoutfit.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. underoutfit.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. underoutfit.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix49
  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Facebook and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 639 KiB

    About 639 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 163 KiB

    1 image could be 163 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 699 ms

    699 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 699 ms of main-thread work and 705 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    511 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (511 KiB).

  • Shopify adds 335 ms

    335 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 335 ms of main-thread work and 866 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 350 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Klaviyo adds 210 ms

    210 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 210 ms of main-thread work and 525 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 40 KiB

    About 40 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.6 s

    28.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Woman in Underoutfit seamless bra and high-waist underwear,…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 696 ms

    696 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 696 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.19

    0.19

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 988 ms

    988 ms

    Real visitors wait 988 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.12

    0.12

    The layout shifts by 0.12 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 333 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 333 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (124), fonts 496 KiB (11) and images 365 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Logo-Transparent.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    147 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example edited_hero.png at 2,056 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 147 KiB.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.03 g of CO₂e: 123.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8890
  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 43 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 43 pages on underoutfit.com and 10 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 90 characters

    Your meta description is 90 characters: “Underoutfit - The most comfortable bras, underwear and shapewear. 180 days to try at home.”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Homepage | Underoutfit Official Store”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.underoutfit.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.underoutfit.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.underoutfit.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (814 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/tops and https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/cami-tank all use the title “Women's Tops – Seamless Shaping Camis & Tanks | Underoutfit”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/best-sellers-1, https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/underwear-1, https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/modal, https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/all, https://www.underoutfit.com/pages/returns-exchanges and https://www.underoutfit.com/pages/contact-us use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/cami-tank, whose canonical is https://www.underoutfit.com/collections/tops. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.underoutfit.com/pages/returns-exchanges has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=175015338&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=a28a2abb-16e9-4558-81e9-bea3813fc063&bo=1&sid=b8b7a840dbd011f19539c36ae9111dfe&vid=b8b7d9c0dbd011f1a3b6d712d427ad0a&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 781 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 781 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP BRAS” and “SHOP UNDERWEAR”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop Bras”, “Shop Underwear” and “Shop Now →”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 24 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and “40,000+ Reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 33 cookies set on arrival

    33

    Opening the homepage sets 33 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 78 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 78 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at underoutfit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Remix
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on underoutfit.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25