Website review, no card needed
uopeople.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202638 issues · 90 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on uopeople.edu, 16 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 270 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 264 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 256 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 320 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 652 KiBAbout 652 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
9,718 HTML elements
The page has 9,718 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
500 ms · 108 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (108 KiB).
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 529 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 450 ms.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 262 ms
262 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 262 ms of main-thread work and 163 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and varify.io and others), adding 460 KiB and 455 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
7 KiB1 image could be 7 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sYour largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 10.9 s
10.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 361 ms
361 msReal visitors wait 361 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 4.7 s
4.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 270 ms to 320 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.057
0.057The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.057, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.35 g of CO₂e: 42.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.2 MB in 54 requests
1.2 MBYour homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 54 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (22), fonts 66 KiB (4) and HTML 63 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (4 elements)
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
17 images without alt text
17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 13 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (95 characters)
Your title is 95 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Online University, Tuition-Free, Accredited Degrees | University of the People - Online C…”.
Meta description is long (165 characters)
Your meta description is 165 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
153 internal links, 33 external
The homepage links to 153 pages on uopeople.edu and 33 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “With more than 270,000 students worldwide, University of the People has redefined higher education: 100% online, accred…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.uopeople.edu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, CollegeOrUniversity, FAQPage, ImageObject and Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.uopeople.edu/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.uopeople.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (890 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page slow to respond
https://www.uopeople.edu/fr took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5772303&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=38e2024d-2739-4614-84cb-5a840d0f7c20&bo=1&sid=36ef8030d36011f194f4f5dee11031cb&vid=36efbb20d36011f1a87c53ab29fea977&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918.
10 small tap targets
10 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 low-resolution images
3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 666 words of copy
The homepage carries about 666 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request Info (opens in new tab)” and “Apply Now (opens in new tab)”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Request Info”, “Apply Now” and “How To Apply”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks, 16 customer or partner logos and “more than 270,000 students”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uopeople.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 26
- Founded
- 2009
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on uopeople.edu, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.