Website review, no card needed
upol.cz website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202634 issues · 84 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on upol.cz, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 147 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
5.7 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.7 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 647 KiBAbout 647 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
2.3 s · 544 KiB15 images could be 544 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 322 KiBAbout 322 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.2 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.2 s).
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Instagram and others), adding 1.1 MB and 623 ms of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 602 ms
602 msYouTube costs a phone 602 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 231 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 43 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (43 KiB).
Document request latency
38 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify JavaScript
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 798 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 112 ms
112 msYour server sent the HTML in 112 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s
17.8 sYour largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 18.0 s
18.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.3 s
10.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.181
0.181The layout shifts by 0.181 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 147 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 152 ms
152 msReal visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 684 ms
684 msReal visitors wait 684 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 177 ms
177 msScripts block the page for only 177 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.0 MB in 84 requests
3.0 MBYour homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (38), scripts 1.2 MB (18) and stylesheets 318 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images in older formats
10 images (608 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
293 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example minislider_strategie-up1.svg at 1,512 px wide, shown at 328 px. Resized copies would save about 293 KiB.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (566 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.84 g of CO₂e: 101.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 31 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.upol.cz/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
78 internal links, 65 external
The homepage links to 78 pages on upol.cz and 65 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 107 characters
Your meta description is 107 characters: “Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci je druhá nejstarší univerzita v českých zemích, na Moravě pak je nejstarší.”.
Title: 31 characters
Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.upol.cz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (532 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
11 pages share a meta description
https://www.upol.cz/studenti, https://www.upol.cz/zamestnanci, https://www.upol.cz/absolventi, https://www.upol.cz/czv, https://www.upol.cz/kontakty and https://www.upol.cz/univerzita/hodnoceni-kvality and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.upol.cz/studenti, https://www.upol.cz/zamestnanci, https://www.upol.cz/absolventi, https://www.upol.cz/czv, https://www.upol.cz/en and https://www.upol.cz/bezpecne-prostredi have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.upol.cz/zamestnanci took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
51 of 54 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 305 words of copy
The homepage carries about 305 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Matomo.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at upol.cz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- TYPO3 CMS
- Analytics
- Matomo
- Hosting
- Cesnet2
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on upol.cz, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.