Website review, no card needed

upol.cz logo

upol.cz website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202634 issues · 84 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on upol.cz, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
154 ms139 msMay 9Oct 24147 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026152 ms
May 16, 2026147 ms
May 23, 2026147 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026145 ms
Jun 13, 2026146 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026148 ms
Jul 4, 2026149 ms
Jul 11, 2026150 ms
Jul 18, 2026148 ms
Jul 25, 2026148 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026148 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026144 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026143 ms
Sep 12, 2026142 ms
Sep 19, 2026141 ms
Sep 26, 2026141 ms
Oct 3, 2026141 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026146 ms
Oct 24, 2026147 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of upol.cz (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. upol.cz at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. upol.cz at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. upol.cz at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. upol.cz at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. upol.cz at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. upol.cz at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. upol.cz at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. upol.cz at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

8 to fix48
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.7 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 647 KiB

    About 647 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.3 s · 544 KiB

    15 images could be 544 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 322 KiB

    About 322 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.2 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.2 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Instagram and others), adding 1.1 MB and 623 ms of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 602 ms

    602 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 602 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 231 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 43 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (43 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    38 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 798 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 112 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    Your largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.0 s

    18.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.181

    0.181

    The layout shifts by 0.181 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 147 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 152 ms

    152 ms

    Real visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 684 ms

    684 ms

    Real visitors wait 684 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 177 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 3.0 MB in 84 requests

    3.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (38), scripts 1.2 MB (18) and stylesheets 318 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (608 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    293 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example minislider_strategie-up1.svg at 1,512 px wide, shown at 328 px. Resized copies would save about 293 KiB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (566 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.84 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.84 g of CO₂e: 101.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9294
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 31 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9277
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.upol.cz/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 78 internal links, 65 external

    The homepage links to 78 pages on upol.cz and 65 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 107 characters

    Your meta description is 107 characters: “Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci je druhá nejstarší univerzita v českých zemích, na Moravě pak je nejstarší.”.

  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.upol.cz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (532 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 11 pages share a meta description

    https://www.upol.cz/studenti, https://www.upol.cz/zamestnanci, https://www.upol.cz/absolventi, https://www.upol.cz/czv, https://www.upol.cz/kontakty and https://www.upol.cz/univerzita/hodnoceni-kvality and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.upol.cz/studenti, https://www.upol.cz/zamestnanci, https://www.upol.cz/absolventi, https://www.upol.cz/czv, https://www.upol.cz/en and https://www.upol.cz/bezpecne-prostredi have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.upol.cz/zamestnanci took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    51 of 54 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 305 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 305 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Matomo.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at upol.cz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
TYPO3 CMS
Analytics
Matomo
Hosting
Cesnet2

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on upol.cz, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25