Website review, no card needed

upsu.net logo

upsu.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202644 issues · 86 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on upsu.net, 15 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s765 msMay 2Oct 171.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.0 s
May 9, 2026971 ms
May 16, 2026962 ms
May 23, 2026934 ms
May 30, 2026818 ms
Jun 6, 2026979 ms
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 2026997 ms
Jul 4, 2026975 ms
Jul 11, 2026934 ms
Jul 18, 2026939 ms
Jul 25, 2026965 ms
Aug 1, 20261.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 2026918 ms
Sep 12, 2026878 ms
Sep 19, 20261.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms72 msMay 2Oct 1785 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202689 ms
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202685 ms
May 30, 202681 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jun 13, 202686 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202686 ms
Jul 4, 202685 ms
Jul 11, 202680 ms
Jul 18, 202676 ms
Jul 25, 202676 ms
Aug 1, 202676 ms
Aug 8, 202681 ms
Aug 15, 202697 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 2026103 ms
Sep 5, 202693 ms
Sep 12, 202681 ms
Sep 19, 202682 ms
Sep 26, 202683 ms
Oct 3, 202683 ms
Oct 10, 202684 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of upsu.net (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. upsu.net at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. upsu.net at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. upsu.net at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. upsu.net at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. upsu.net at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. upsu.net at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. upsu.net at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. upsu.net at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    40.2 s · 27.2 MB

    14 images could be 27.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 40.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    34.0 s · 22.3 MB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 186 KiB

    About 186 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, on-forge.com and Unpkg and others), adding 28.1 MB and 266 ms of main-thread time.

  • wildrocket.io adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    wildrocket.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 27.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 424 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 15 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • rsms.me adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    rsms.me costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    185 KiB

    About 185 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 523 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 61.0 s

    61.0 s

    Your largest element takes 61.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 62.5 s

    62.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 62.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 438 ms

    438 ms

    Real visitors wait 438 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 493 ms

    493 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 493 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 655 ms

    655 ms

    Real visitors wait 655 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037

    0.037

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 46.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 13 images far larger than shown

    45.0 MB

    13 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ELcl15aLar6nolYjdseSRXR3hH22CDE89tX2NQ0U.jpg at 8,256 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 45.0 MB.

  • Page weight: 28.4 MB in 35 requests

    28.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 28.4 MB in 35 requests on a phone: images 27.6 MB (19), scripts 489 KiB (5) and fonts 345 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 14 images in older formats

    14 images (47.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (39.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 8.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.06 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.06 g of CO₂e: 966.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8190
  • Hidden but focusable

    2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8365
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Portsmouth SU”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (333 characters)

    Your meta description is 333 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://upsu.net/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 131 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 131 pages on upsu.net and 12 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://upsu.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (977 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://upsu.net/your-union and https://upsu.net/your-union/information/for-students all use the title “Your Union - UPSU”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://upsu.net/your-union/build-confidence/survival-guide, https://upsu.net/your-union/build-confidence/international-students-guidance, https://upsu.net/careers, https://upsu.net/your-union/build-confidence/using-ai, https://upsu.net/your-union/build-confidence/the-portsmouth-award and https://upsu.net/your-union/build-confidence/humans-of-portsmouth and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9684
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://upsu.net/.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix78
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 472 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 472 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “StART”, “Start a new Group” and “Contact the Groups Team”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Umami.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at upsu.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on upsu.net, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25