Website review, no card needed

usajobs.gov logo

usajobs.gov website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202628 issues · 80 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on usajobs.gov, 8 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
751 ms615 msApr 18Oct 3633 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 2026673 ms
Apr 25, 2026675 ms
May 2, 2026703 ms
May 9, 2026732 ms
May 16, 2026735 ms
May 23, 2026723 ms
May 30, 2026692 ms
Jun 6, 2026654 ms
Jun 13, 2026639 ms
Jun 20, 2026636 ms
Jun 27, 2026634 ms
Jul 4, 2026633 ms
Jul 11, 2026631 ms
Jul 18, 2026631 ms
Jul 25, 2026634 ms
Aug 1, 2026638 ms
Aug 8, 2026640 ms
Aug 15, 2026642 ms
Aug 22, 2026644 ms
Aug 29, 2026641 ms
Sep 5, 2026641 ms
Sep 12, 2026639 ms
Sep 19, 2026636 ms
Sep 26, 2026635 ms
Oct 3, 2026633 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
95 ms92 msApr 18Oct 394 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202694 ms
Apr 25, 202694 ms
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 202694 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202695 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202695 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202693 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202692 ms
Aug 8, 202692 ms
Aug 15, 202693 ms
Aug 22, 202693 ms
Aug 29, 202692 ms
Sep 5, 202693 ms
Sep 12, 202693 ms
Sep 19, 202693 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of usajobs.gov (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. usajobs.gov at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. usajobs.gov at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. usajobs.gov at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. usajobs.gov at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. usajobs.gov at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. usajobs.gov at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. usajobs.gov at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. usajobs.gov at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix68
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 376 KiB

    About 376 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 89 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (89 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 403 ms

    403 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 403 ms of main-thread work and 642 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ttecgov.us and digitalgov.gov and others), adding 846 KiB and 479 ms of main-thread time.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    200 ms · 2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 153 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    11 KiB

    1 image could be 11 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 68. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 442 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Your largest element takes 9.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Shape America's future Save your favorite jobs and searches…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors wait 0.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 441 ms

    441 ms

    Real visitors wait 441 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 175 ms

    175 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 175 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.33 g of CO₂e: 40.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.2 MB in 37 requests

    1.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 37 requests on a phone: scripts 903 KiB (12), images 131 KiB (12) and fonts 70 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9698
  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9282
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.usajobs.gov/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 34 internal links, 52 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on usajobs.gov and 52 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “Search and apply for federal jobs. Learn about unique hiring paths for veterans, students and graduates, individuals wi…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Shape America's future”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “USAJOBS - The Federal Government's official employment site”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.usajobs.gov/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,157 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix73
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.usajobs.gov/event/5750 has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 5 pages share a title

    https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/profile/dashboard, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/profile, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/document/resumes, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/notifications and https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/talentnetworks all use the title “USAJOBS - Login Gov Acknowledgement”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/profile/dashboard, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/profile, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/document/resumes, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/notifications, https://www.usajobs.gov/applicant/talentnetworks and https://www.usajobs.gov/Event and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 423 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 423 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Learn more about starting your career” and “Get Started”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at usajobs.gov, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1996

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on usajobs.gov, including 10 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25