Website review, no card needed

U.S. News & World Report logo

usnews.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202636 issues · 49 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on usnews.com, 15 of them high impact, across 49 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for U.S. News & World Report

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

48F

Not ranked: the homepage didn't load normally in this review.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of usnews.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. usnews.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  2. usnews.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  3. usnews.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  4. usnews.com at 9.7 s9.7 s
  5. usnews.com at 12.2 s12.2 s
  6. usnews.com at 14.6 s14.6 s
  7. usnews.com at 17.0 s17.0 s
  8. usnews.com at 19.5 s19.5 s

Speed

16 to fix17
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.9 s · 2.3 MB

    About 2.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.2 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.

  • Main-thread work: 19.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 19.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 12.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Tealium adds 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Tealium costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 73 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 17

    17/100

    Your mobile performance score is 17 (desktop: 29). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Tealium, Google/Doubleclick Ads and saambaa.com and others), adding 4.7 MB and 4.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    4.5 MB

    7 images could be 4.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 2.5 MB

    168 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.5 MB).

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    780 ms

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 780 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • saambaa.com adds 544 ms

    544 ms

    saambaa.com costs a phone 544 ms of main-thread work and 343 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 119 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 119 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • clipcentric.com adds 227 ms

    227 ms

    clipcentric.com costs a phone 227 ms of main-thread work and 2.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 429 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Amazon Ads adds 249 ms

    249 ms

    Amazon Ads costs a phone 249 ms of main-thread work and 402 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,023 HTML elements

    The page has 2,023 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Document request latency

    150 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 150 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 109 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.7 s

    25.7 s

    Your largest element takes 25.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “It’s not just partisan takeovers that are possible in midte…”.

  • Speed Index: 36.8 s

    36.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 36.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 86.5 s

    86.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 86.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 361 ms

    361 ms

    Real visitors wait 361 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.183

    0.183

    The layout shifts by 0.183 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 593 ms

    593 ms

    Real visitors wait 593 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix0
  • Page weight: 34.5 MB in 1,498 requests

    34.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 34.5 MB in 1,498 requests on a phone: images 24.4 MB (505), scripts 6.1 MB (201) and media 2.2 MB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 9.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    9.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.77 g of CO₂e: 1172.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fix84
  • Form elements do not have associated labels

    Form elements do not have associated labels (1 element).

  • 14 tap targets too small

    14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes

    Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (1 element).

  • Links do not have a discernible name

    Links do not have a discernible name (1 element).

  • Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

    Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order (7 elements).

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9250
  • robots.txt is invalid

    robots.txt has 1 error.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5050
  • 46 third-party cookies

    46 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 3 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 28 console errors

    28 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“[GSI_LOGGER]: FedCM get() rejects with NetworkError: Error retrieving a token.”).

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

Content and conversion

1 to fix0
  • Homepage could not be loaded

    We could not load https://usnews.com from our server, so the homepage checks are missing. If the site is up, it may block automated visitors.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at usnews.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Akamai

Company

Founded
1933

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on usnews.com, including 25 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25