Website review, no card needed

vallen.ca logo

vallen.ca website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202658 issues · 90 checks

This review found 58 issues worth fixing on vallen.ca, 25 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 242.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
243 ms145 msMay 9Oct 24212 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026197 ms
May 16, 2026212 ms
May 23, 2026221 ms
May 30, 2026214 ms
Jun 27, 2026232 ms
Jul 4, 2026208 ms
Jul 11, 2026203 ms
Jul 18, 2026176 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 8, 2026156 ms
Aug 15, 2026164 ms
Aug 22, 2026179 ms
Aug 29, 2026189 ms
Sep 5, 2026196 ms
Sep 12, 2026179 ms
Sep 19, 2026178 ms
Sep 26, 2026178 ms
Oct 3, 2026177 ms
Oct 10, 2026200 ms
Oct 17, 2026205 ms
Oct 24, 2026212 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vallen.ca (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vallen.ca at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. vallen.ca at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. vallen.ca at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. vallen.ca at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. vallen.ca at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. vallen.ca at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. vallen.ca at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. vallen.ca at 7.4 s7.4 s

Speed

12 to fix8
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.6 s · 1.1 MB

    19 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • YouTube adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 146 KiB

    About 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 8

    8/100

    Your mobile performance score is 8. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 4.9 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 789 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,248 HTML elements

    The page has 2,248 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • kc-usercontent.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    kc-usercontent.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Algolia adds 2 ms

    2 ms

    Algolia costs a phone 2 ms of main-thread work and 395 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3 KiB).

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.60

    0.60

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 14.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s

    24.7 s

    Your largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Confidence in Cold Conditions”.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.9 s

    35.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.7 s

    14.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.401

    0.401

    The layout shifts by 0.401 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 212 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Real visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 6.9 MB in 119 requests

    6.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 119 requests on a phone: scripts 3.5 MB (19), images 2.2 MB (45) and other files 463 KiB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    143 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Ear Protection 1600 x 900.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 354 px. Resized copies would save about 143 KiB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (344 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.95 g of CO₂e: 233.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8588
  • Hidden but focusable

    8 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 4238
  • Page is set to noindex

    The robots meta tag says “noindex,nofollow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.

  • robots.txt blocks all crawlers

    Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Blocked from indexing

    Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.

  • 35 links crawlers can't follow

    35 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (197 characters)

    Your meta description is 197 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://vallen.ca/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 47 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on vallen.ca and 5 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Vallen Canada - Leader in industrial supplies and safety products”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers

    6 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://vallen.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix74
  • 4 linked pages hidden from search

    https://vallen.ca/locations, https://vallen.ca/content/cold-stress, https://vallen.ca/content/miller and https://vallen.ca/content/exclusive-brands are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 14 pages share 2 titles

    https://vallen.ca/promotions, https://vallen.ca/products/categories, https://vallen.ca/products/groups/details/PF-15741575, https://vallen.ca/products/100-abrasives, https://vallen.ca/products/120-tools-and-equipment/02-hand-tools and https://vallen.ca/products/110-janitorial-and-cleaning-supplies and 5 others all use the title “Vallen - Industry Leader in Industrial Supplies and Safety Products”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    https://vallen.ca/promotions, https://vallen.ca/products/categories, https://vallen.ca/products/groups/details/PF-15741575, https://vallen.ca/products/100-abrasives, https://vallen.ca/products/120-tools-and-equipment/02-hand-tools and https://vallen.ca/products/110-janitorial-and-cleaning-supplies and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://vallen.ca/locations, https://vallen.ca/content/cold-stress, https://vallen.ca/content/miller and https://vallen.ca/content/exclusive-brands use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    https://vallen.ca/locations, https://vallen.ca/promotions, https://vallen.ca/products/categories, https://vallen.ca/content/cold-stress, https://vallen.ca/products/groups/details/PF-15741575 and https://vallen.ca/content/miller and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 33 small tap targets

    33 of 60 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 12 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 396 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 396 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “learn more”, “shop the promotion” and “shop now”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vallen.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 58 issues on vallen.ca, including 23 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25