Website review, no card needed
vallen.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202658 issues · 90 checks
This review found 58 issues worth fixing on vallen.ca, 25 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 212 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 221 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 212 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
3.6 s · 1.1 MB19 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
YouTube adds 1.4 s
1.4 sYouTube costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 146 KiBAbout 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 8
8/100Your mobile performance score is 8. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.8 s
A phone's processor spends 7.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 4.9 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 789 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,248 HTML elements
The page has 2,248 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
kc-usercontent.com adds 0 ms
0 mskc-usercontent.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Algolia adds 2 ms
2 msAlgolia costs a phone 2 ms of main-thread work and 395 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3 KiB).
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.60
0.60For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 14.1 s
14.1 sThe first text or image appears after 14.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s
24.7 sYour largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Confidence in Cold Conditions”.
Time to Interactive: 35.9 s
35.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.7 s
14.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s
2.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.401
0.401The layout shifts by 0.401 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 212 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 194 ms
194 msReal visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 119 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 119 requests on a phone: scripts 3.5 MB (19), images 2.2 MB (45) and other files 463 KiB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
15 images in older formats
15 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
143 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Ear Protection 1600 x 900.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 354 px. Resized copies would save about 143 KiB.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (344 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.95 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.95 g of CO₂e: 233.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
8 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Page is set to noindex
The robots meta tag says “noindex,nofollow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Blocked from indexing
Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.
35 links crawlers can't follow
35 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (197 characters)
Your meta description is 197 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://vallen.ca/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
47 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 47 pages on vallen.ca and 5 external pages.
2 checks passed
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Vallen Canada - Leader in industrial supplies and safety products”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://vallen.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 linked pages hidden from search
https://vallen.ca/locations, https://vallen.ca/content/cold-stress, https://vallen.ca/content/miller and https://vallen.ca/content/exclusive-brands are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
14 pages share 2 titles
https://vallen.ca/promotions, https://vallen.ca/products/categories, https://vallen.ca/products/groups/details/PF-15741575, https://vallen.ca/products/100-abrasives, https://vallen.ca/products/120-tools-and-equipment/02-hand-tools and https://vallen.ca/products/110-janitorial-and-cleaning-supplies and 5 others all use the title “Vallen - Industry Leader in Industrial Supplies and Safety Products”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
11 pages without a meta description
https://vallen.ca/promotions, https://vallen.ca/products/categories, https://vallen.ca/products/groups/details/PF-15741575, https://vallen.ca/products/100-abrasives, https://vallen.ca/products/120-tools-and-equipment/02-hand-tools and https://vallen.ca/products/110-janitorial-and-cleaning-supplies and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages share a meta description
https://vallen.ca/locations, https://vallen.ca/content/cold-stress, https://vallen.ca/content/miller and https://vallen.ca/content/exclusive-brands use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
14 pages without an H1
https://vallen.ca/locations, https://vallen.ca/promotions, https://vallen.ca/products/categories, https://vallen.ca/content/cold-stress, https://vallen.ca/products/groups/details/PF-15741575 and https://vallen.ca/content/miller and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
33 small tap targets
33 of 60 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 12 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 396 words of copy
The homepage carries about 396 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “learn more”, “shop the promotion” and “shop now”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vallen.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 58 issues on vallen.ca, including 23 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.