Website review, no card needed

vbaplans.com logo

vbaplans.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202631 issues · 86 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on vbaplans.com, 15 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s715 msApr 25Oct 10757 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 2026960 ms
May 2, 2026974 ms
May 9, 2026958 ms
May 16, 2026913 ms
May 23, 2026844 ms
May 30, 2026804 ms
Jun 6, 2026813 ms
Jun 13, 2026830 ms
Jun 20, 2026789 ms
Jun 27, 2026781 ms
Jul 4, 2026776 ms
Jul 11, 2026770 ms
Jul 18, 2026803 ms
Jul 25, 2026818 ms
Aug 1, 2026794 ms
Aug 8, 2026796 ms
Aug 15, 2026798 ms
Aug 22, 2026785 ms
Aug 29, 2026774 ms
Sep 5, 2026758 ms
Sep 12, 2026752 ms
Sep 19, 2026749 ms
Sep 26, 2026771 ms
Oct 3, 2026772 ms
Oct 10, 2026757 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
78 ms70 msApr 25Oct 1073 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202677 ms
May 2, 202677 ms
May 9, 202677 ms
May 16, 202676 ms
May 23, 202675 ms
May 30, 202674 ms
Jun 6, 202674 ms
Jun 13, 202675 ms
Jun 20, 202672 ms
Jun 27, 202672 ms
Jul 4, 202672 ms
Jul 11, 202671 ms
Jul 18, 202674 ms
Jul 25, 202676 ms
Aug 1, 202676 ms
Aug 8, 202676 ms
Aug 15, 202676 ms
Aug 22, 202674 ms
Aug 29, 202673 ms
Sep 5, 202672 ms
Sep 12, 202672 ms
Sep 19, 202672 ms
Sep 26, 202673 ms
Oct 3, 202673 ms
Oct 10, 202673 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vbaplans.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vbaplans.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. vbaplans.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. vbaplans.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. vbaplans.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. vbaplans.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. vbaplans.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. vbaplans.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. vbaplans.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    5.8 s · 5.1 MB

    7 images could be 5.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.9 s · 861 KiB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (861 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 77). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 152 KiB

    About 152 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 15 KiB

    About 15 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Hubspot, Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 446 KiB and 161 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 50 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 366 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.8 s

    24.8 s

    Your largest element takes 24.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero”.

  • Speed Index: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.9 s

    25.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 77 ms to 73 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors wait 0.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 77 ms

    77 ms

    Real visitors wait 77 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 380 ms

    380 ms

    Real visitors wait 380 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix28
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 67 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 67 requests on a phone: images 5.2 MB (15), scripts 546 KiB (23) and other files 145 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 5.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    4.8 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example AdobeStock_1942666239.jpeg at 6,000 px wide, shown at 367 px. Resized copies would save about 4.8 MB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (5.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.72 g of CO₂e: 206.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8390
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (3 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10086
  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “VBA | Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 210 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 210 pages on vbaplans.com and 11 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “We provide extraordinary vision and dental benefits, the best group coverage options, and outstanding service for our m…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Everyday Benefits Made Extraordinary”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vbaplans.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vbaplans.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,587 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a title

    /vision and /vision/members all use the title “Custom Group Vision Benefits | VBA”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 754 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 754 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Request for Proposal”, “Join the Network” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vbaplans.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on vbaplans.com, including 10 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25