Website review, no card needed

vega.pe logo

vega.pe website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202661 issues · 97 checks

This review found 61 issues worth fixing on vega.pe, 29 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.2 sMay 9Oct 243.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.5 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
427 ms324 msMay 9Oct 24336 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026415 ms
May 16, 2026415 ms
May 23, 2026410 ms
May 30, 2026408 ms
Jun 6, 2026414 ms
Jun 13, 2026410 ms
Jun 20, 2026401 ms
Jun 27, 2026390 ms
Jul 4, 2026380 ms
Jul 11, 2026372 ms
Jul 18, 2026376 ms
Jul 25, 2026378 ms
Aug 1, 2026382 ms
Aug 8, 2026387 ms
Aug 15, 2026384 ms
Aug 22, 2026387 ms
Aug 29, 2026392 ms
Sep 5, 2026398 ms
Sep 12, 2026411 ms
Sep 19, 2026412 ms
Sep 26, 2026399 ms
Oct 3, 2026389 ms
Oct 10, 2026371 ms
Oct 17, 2026351 ms
Oct 24, 2026336 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vega.pe (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vega.pe at 1.9 s1.9 s
  2. vega.pe at 3.7 s3.7 s
  3. vega.pe at 5.6 s5.6 s
  4. vega.pe at 7.4 s7.4 s
  5. vega.pe at 9.3 s9.3 s
  6. vega.pe at 11.2 s11.2 s
  7. vega.pe at 13.0 s13.0 s
  8. vega.pe at 14.9 s14.9 s

Speed

17 to fix11
  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 2.9 MB

    18 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 2.3 s of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • vtexassets.com adds 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 1.8 s of main-thread work and 4.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 17.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 17.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    1.6 s

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.6 s on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    1.6 s

    The HTML itself could arrive about 1.6 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 11

    11/100

    Your mobile performance score is 11. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, vtexassets.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 8.0 MB and 7.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 1.9 MB

    About 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 904 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 434 KiB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (434 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • TikTok adds 580 ms

    580 ms

    TikTok costs a phone 580 ms of main-thread work and 160 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 85 KiB

    About 85 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 301 ms

    301 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 228 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Your server takes 1.7 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 57 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 57 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.28

    0.28

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.4 s

    37.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.1 s

    9.1 s

    Your largest element takes 9.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 13.7 s

    13.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.427

    0.427

    The layout shifts by 0.427 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 312 ms

    312 ms

    Real visitors wait 312 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 415 ms to 336 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 7.6 MB in 184 requests

    7.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.6 MB in 184 requests on a phone: images 3.3 MB (46), scripts 3.1 MB (67) and other files 735 KiB (52). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images far larger than shown

    2.4 MB

    9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 389c8105-9776-4ad9-a4a1-0c33810ca03d___2feb30c99f8bc90ddfb88 at 6,946 px wide, shown at 374 px. Resized copies would save about 2.4 MB.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (2.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.16 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.16 g of CO₂e: 259.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 7284
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 13 tap targets too small

    13 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 22 links without text

    22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h4 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10083
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Tu mercado,”, “de casa” and “Equipa tu”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (169 characters)

    Your meta description is 169 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 48 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 48 pages on vega.pe and 15 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Vega.pe| Muchas OFERTAS para tu NEGOCIO y HOGAR”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vega.pe/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vega.pe/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vega.pe/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (432 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix55
  • 3 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.vega.pe/tecnologia/televisores/hd-y-full-hd/nanocell/qled-y-neo-qled/ultra-hd, https://www.vega.pe/tecnologia/parlantes/qled-y-neo-qled/torres-de-sonido/ultra-hd/televiores and https://www.vega.pe/electrohogar/lavadora-y-lavaseca/refrigeradoras-y-frigobares, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.vega.pe/vegaentradas266 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://www.vega.pe/supermercado and https://www.vega.pe/electro-y-hogar all use the title “Vega.pe| Muchas OFERTAS para tu NEGOCIO y HOGAR”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://www.vega.pe/bebidas-y-snacks, https://www.vega.pe/desayuno, https://www.vega.pe/vegaentradas266, https://www.vega.pe/supermercado and https://www.vega.pe/electro-y-hogar use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://www.vega.pe/electrohogar/electrodomesticos, https://www.vega.pe/tecnologia, https://www.vega.pe/vegaentradas266, https://www.vega.pe/supermercado, https://www.vega.pe/electro-y-hogar and https://www.vega.pe/tecnologia/telefonia and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.vega.pe/electro-y-hogar has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.vega.pe/tecnologia, https://www.vega.pe/vegaentradas266, https://www.vega.pe/supermercado and https://www.vega.pe/electro-y-hogar took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 347 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 347 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 44 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 44 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vega.pe, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Company

Founded
1996
Headquarters
Lima

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 61 issues on vega.pe, including 30 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25