Website review, no card needed
vertical-earth.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202637 issues · 90 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on vertical-earth.com, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 978 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 918 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 911 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 941 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 958 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 975 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 910 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 959 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 908 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 923 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 965 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 877 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 894 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 858 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 845 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 903 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 70 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 68 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 69 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 70 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 83 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.4 s · 19.1 MB32 images could be 19.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 351 KiBAbout 351 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 86 KiBAbout 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 403 ms
403 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 403 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 837 KiB and 452 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 4 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4 KiB).
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 147 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
10 ms · 6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 54. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 11.3 s
11.3 sThe first text or image appears after 11.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s
15.6 sYour largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 11.3 s
11.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.2 s
16.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
26 images without width and height
26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 83 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 95 ms
95 msReal visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 129 ms
129 msScripts block the page for only 129 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 27.2 MB in 110 requests
27.2 MBYour homepage downloads 27.2 MB in 110 requests on a phone: images 25.2 MB (67), scripts 1.4 MB (21) and other files 351 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
24 images over 500 KB
24 images weigh 22.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
27 images far larger than shown
15.7 MB27 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Joe-Anderson-Headshot-scaled.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 15.7 MB.
37 images below the first screen load straight away
37 images further down the page (24.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
32 images in older formats
32 images (16.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 7.7 g of CO₂ per visit
7.72 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.72 g of CO₂e: 926.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
114 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 114 pages on vertical-earth.com and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Building Beyond The Job Site”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.vertical-earth.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vertical-earth.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.vertical-earth.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (598 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.vertical-earth.com/location_type/atlanta-georgia and https://www.vertical-earth.com/projects/yellow-creek-recreation-area all use the title “Yellow Creek Recreation Area”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.vertical-earth.com/about-us, https://www.vertical-earth.com/services, https://www.vertical-earth.com/our-work, https://www.vertical-earth.com/location_type/florida, https://www.vertical-earth.com/location_type/atlanta-georgia and https://www.vertical-earth.com/location_type/savannah-georgia and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://www.vertical-earth.com/contact-us has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 642 words of copy
The homepage carries about 642 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY ONLINE” and “Contact us”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Apply Online” and “Learn More”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vertical-earth.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2024.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on vertical-earth.com, including 12 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.