Website review, no card needed

vertigis.com logo

vertigis.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202646 issues · 86 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on vertigis.com, 21 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
135 ms98 msMay 16Oct 31102 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026108 ms
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 2026111 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026111 ms
Jun 27, 2026108 ms
Jul 4, 2026107 ms
Jul 11, 2026108 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026114 ms
Aug 1, 2026115 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026126 ms
Aug 22, 2026125 ms
Aug 29, 2026125 ms
Sep 5, 2026121 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026126 ms
Oct 10, 2026115 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026102 ms
Oct 31, 2026102 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vertigis.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vertigis.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. vertigis.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  3. vertigis.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  4. vertigis.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  5. vertigis.com at 8.1 s8.1 s
  6. vertigis.com at 9.7 s9.7 s
  7. vertigis.com at 11.3 s11.3 s
  8. vertigis.com at 12.9 s12.9 s

Speed

11 to fix29
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.1 s · 3.4 MB

    About 3.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.9 s · 1.1 MB

    8 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

  • vertigisstudio.com adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    vertigisstudio.com costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 3.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 10.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 29

    29/100

    Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (vertigisstudio.com, Vimeo and Google CDN and others), adding 14.8 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Vimeo adds 647 ms

    647 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 647 ms of main-thread work and 11.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 346 KiB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (346 KiB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 630 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • 2,574 HTML elements

    The page has 2,574 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 58 ms

    58 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 58 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 139.9 s

    139.9 s

    Your largest element takes 139.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 52.0 s

    52.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 52.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 172.4 s

    172.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 172.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.11

    0.11

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 102 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Real visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 63.5 MB in 712 requests

    63.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 63.5 MB in 712 requests on a phone: images 48.4 MB (194), other files 8.4 MB (328) and scripts 6.3 MB (161). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 18.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    17.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 17.99 g of CO₂e: 2159.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 7185
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Positive tabindex

    8 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 62 images without alt text

    62 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 42 links without text

    42 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8580
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (169 characters)

    Your meta description is 169 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 9 links with vague text

    9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 416 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 416 pages on vertigis.com and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “VertiGIS - Enterprise Geospatial Mapping Software”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vertigis.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vertigis.com/post-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vertigis.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,174 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.vertigis.com/de and https://www.vertigis.com/fr have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 146 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5883
  • 39 small tap targets

    39 of 59 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,886 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,886 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Request a Demo”.

  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request a Demo” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 10 customer or partner logos and “over 5,000 satisfied customers”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vertigis.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
FullHost

Hiring

Hiring
19 open roles
Teams
Professional Service (9), Sales​ (3), Product (2), SaaS (2)
Job board
recruitee

Company

Founded
2017

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on vertigis.com, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25