Website review, no card needed
vevor.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202655 issues · 93 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on vevor.com, 22 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 177 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.9 s
3.7 s
5.6 s
7.4 s
9.3 s
11.1 s
13.0 s
14.8 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
vevorstatic.com adds 1.5 s
1.5 svevorstatic.com costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 4.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 12.3 s
A phone's processor spends 12.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,320 HTML elements
The page has 3,320 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vevorstatic.com, Facebook and ZenDesk and others), adding 5.6 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 807 KiB110 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (807 KiB).
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 704 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 360 ms
360 msFacebook costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 315 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ZenDesk adds 259 ms
259 msZenDesk costs a phone 259 ms of main-thread work and 412 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
81 KiB8 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
71 KiBAbout 71 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
46 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.5 s
23.5 sYour largest element takes 23.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 18.1 s
18.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 45.8 s
45.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 45.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 208 ms
208 msReal visitors wait 208 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 64% slower for real visitors
+64%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 900 ms
900 msReal visitors wait 900 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.054
0.054The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.054, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.8 MB in 478 requests
8.8 MBYour homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 478 requests on a phone: scripts 3.9 MB (155), images 3.8 MB (145) and other files 660 KiB (160). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
17 images far larger than shown
869 KiB17 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example us/MZY612FT12FT604DRV0/goods_img-v17/6-sided-canopy-shelter- at 500 px wide, shown at 52 px. Resized copies would save about 869 KiB.
37 images in older formats
37 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.48 g of CO₂e: 297.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
39 text elements with low contrast
39 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (380 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 380 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (132 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 132 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
89 links without text
89 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 535 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (183 characters)
Your meta description is 183 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.vevor.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at vevor.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
609 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 609 pages on vevor.com and 0 external pages.
2 checks passed
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “VEVOR|Upgrade. The Home Creator Way”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.vevor.com/.
AI search readiness
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
50%The HTML your server sends has 1,629 of the 3,254 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.vevor.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Other pages
15 pages without a title
https://www.vevor.com/garden-center-c_40251, https://www.vevor.com/tools-c_40028, https://www.vevor.com/automotive-c_40002, https://www.vevor.com/outdoors-c_40020, https://www.vevor.com/plumbing-c_40023 and https://www.vevor.com/appliances-c_40001 and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.vevor.com/garden-center-c_40251, https://www.vevor.com/tools-c_40028, https://www.vevor.com/automotive-c_40002, https://www.vevor.com/outdoors-c_40020, https://www.vevor.com/plumbing-c_40023 and https://www.vevor.com/appliances-c_40001 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.vevor.com/garden-center-c_40251, https://www.vevor.com/tools-c_40028, https://www.vevor.com/automotive-c_40002, https://www.vevor.com/outdoors-c_40020, https://www.vevor.com/plumbing-c_40023 and https://www.vevor.com/appliances-c_40001 and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=17366780&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=0428d1ab-c3fe-4b6b-8bfa-1f8df1af7ef1&bo=2&sid=77ad25e0c5ce11f197f6e7665d4cb149&vid=77ad6fe0c5ce11f1b379b3d0993e432f&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
177 of 216 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 3,254 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,254 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
83 calls to action
The homepage has 83 calls to action, for example “Hello, Sign in Account & Order”, “Shop All Lawn & Garden” and “Shop All Outdoor Power Equipment”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
12 trackers load before any consent
12Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight and 7 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
56 cookies set on arrival
56Opening the homepage sets 56 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
67 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 67 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vevor.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on vevor.com, including 21 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.