Website review, no card needed

vikramsolar.com logo

vikramsolar.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202646 issues · 94 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on vikramsolar.com, 18 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.6 s2.6 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.9 s
May 16, 20265.9 s
May 23, 20266.0 s
May 30, 20266.0 s
Jun 6, 20266.0 s
Jun 13, 20266.1 s
Jun 20, 20266.1 s
Jun 27, 20266.1 s
Jul 4, 20266.0 s
Jul 11, 20266.0 s
Jul 18, 20265.9 s
Jul 25, 20265.9 s
Aug 1, 20265.9 s
Aug 8, 20265.9 s
Aug 15, 20265.9 s
Aug 22, 20266.0 s
Aug 29, 20266.0 s
Sep 5, 20266.0 s
Sep 12, 20266.0 s
Sep 19, 20266.0 s
Sep 26, 20265.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
201 ms150 msMay 9Oct 24194 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026195 ms
May 16, 2026184 ms
May 23, 2026169 ms
May 30, 2026163 ms
Jun 6, 2026158 ms
Jun 13, 2026156 ms
Jun 20, 2026156 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026157 ms
Jul 11, 2026158 ms
Jul 18, 2026157 ms
Jul 25, 2026160 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 8, 2026164 ms
Aug 15, 2026168 ms
Aug 22, 2026170 ms
Aug 29, 2026174 ms
Sep 5, 2026176 ms
Sep 12, 2026180 ms
Sep 19, 2026181 ms
Sep 26, 2026180 ms
Oct 3, 2026180 ms
Oct 10, 2026184 ms
Oct 17, 2026189 ms
Oct 24, 2026194 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vikramsolar.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vikramsolar.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  2. vikramsolar.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  3. vikramsolar.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  4. vikramsolar.com at 7.0 s7.0 s
  5. vikramsolar.com at 8.7 s8.7 s
  6. vikramsolar.com at 10.5 s10.5 s
  7. vikramsolar.com at 12.2 s12.2 s
  8. vikramsolar.com at 13.9 s13.9 s

Speed

14 to fix48
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 s · 13.7 MB

    102 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.9 s · 2.5 MB

    About 2.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and YouTube and others), adding 19.1 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 58 ms

    58 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 58 ms of main-thread work and 14.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 267 KiB

    7 images could be 267 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 479 ms

    479 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 479 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 369 ms

    369 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 369 ms of main-thread work and 976 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 61 KiB

    61 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 298 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • viki.ai adds 19 ms

    19 ms

    viki.ai costs a phone 19 ms of main-thread work and 443 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 157 KiB

    About 157 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.2 s

    14.2 s

    Your largest element takes 14.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.1 s

    37.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 637 ms

    637 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 637 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 211 ms

    211 ms

    Real visitors wait 211 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 48% faster for real visitors

    -48%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.9 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 21.8 MB in 181 requests

    21.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 21.8 MB in 181 requests on a phone: media 14.3 MB (4), scripts 4.7 MB (60) and images 1.9 MB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    pmsgy-banner-mb.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (124 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 6.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.19 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.19 g of CO₂e: 742.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7888
  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 22 images without alt text

    22 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 7590
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Vikram Solar | Among India’s Best Solar Companies for Clean Energy”.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 80 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 80 pages on vikramsolar.com and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Vikram Solar is one of the best solar companies offering clean energy solutions. Explore trusted solar company options …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “ENABLING CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vikramsolar.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, LocalBusiness, Organization and VideoObject.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vikramsolar.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vikramsolar.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (423 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.vikramsolar.com/solar-champion-programme and https://www.vikramsolar.com/explore have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.vikramsolar.com/product-category/hypersol-pro, whose canonical is https://www.vikramsolar.com/pv-modules/hypersol-pro. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 9 pages slow to respond

    https://www.vikramsolar.com/pv-modules, https://www.vikramsolar.com/product-category/paradea, https://www.vikramsolar.com/technological-advancements, https://www.vikramsolar.com/solutions, https://www.vikramsolar.com/epc-solutions and https://www.vikramsolar.com/solar-champion-programme and 3 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6976
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://clicks.polyvalent.co.in/p?o=22038100&m=2498&t=i&auth_token=61979&adv_sub1={REPLACE}.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    21 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 260 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 260 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Earnings Call”, “Contact us” and “learn more”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vikramsolar.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Google Cloud

Company

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Kolkata

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on vikramsolar.com, including 25 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25