Website review, no card needed

vimacosmetics.com logo

vimacosmetics.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202632 issues · 83 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on vimacosmetics.com, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 313.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Oct 31, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
179 ms125 msMay 16Oct 31161 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026145 ms
Jun 6, 2026136 ms
Jun 13, 2026137 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026145 ms
Jul 18, 2026150 ms
Jul 25, 2026144 ms
Aug 1, 2026146 ms
Aug 8, 2026145 ms
Aug 15, 2026138 ms
Aug 22, 2026154 ms
Aug 29, 2026170 ms
Sep 5, 2026173 ms
Sep 12, 2026173 ms
Sep 19, 2026171 ms
Sep 26, 2026165 ms
Oct 3, 2026155 ms
Oct 10, 2026158 ms
Oct 17, 2026157 ms
Oct 24, 2026159 ms
Oct 31, 2026161 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vimacosmetics.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vimacosmetics.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. vimacosmetics.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. vimacosmetics.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. vimacosmetics.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. vimacosmetics.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. vimacosmetics.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. vimacosmetics.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. vimacosmetics.com at 5.6 s5.6 s

Speed

10 to fix43
  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 s · 620 KiB

    11 images could be 620 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 390 KiB

    About 390 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 226 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (226 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Klaviyo and alia-prod.com and others), adding 1.7 MB and 945 ms of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 451 ms

    451 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 451 ms of main-thread work and 764 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 399 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Klaviyo adds 215 ms

    215 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 215 ms of main-thread work and 504 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,066 HTML elements

    The page has 2,066 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    About 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    50 ms

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 50 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    45 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.1 s

    16.1 s

    Your largest element takes 16.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Woman holding VIMA Magic Skin Changing Foundation and VIMA …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 690 ms

    690 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 690 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 161 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 146 ms

    146 ms

    Real visitors wait 146 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 592 ms

    592 ms

    Real visitors wait 592 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 287 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 287 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (117), images 877 KiB (30) and other files 763 KiB (89). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    450 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example NEW_DONE_36.png at 1,500 px wide, shown at 79 px. Resized copies would save about 450 KiB.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.98 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.98 g of CO₂e: 117.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“@media screen and (max-width: 749px) { .header__h…” and “Your skin.Just better.Now 60% off.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (316 characters)

    Your meta description is 316 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 92 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 92 pages on vimacosmetics.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Best Changing Foundation | VIMA Cosmetics”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://vimacosmetics.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vimacosmetics.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://vimacosmetics.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (736 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://vimacosmetics.com/pages/ambassadorprogram has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://vimacosmetics.com/pages/contact and https://vimacosmetics.com/pages/returns-refunds have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    4 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 53 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Shopify is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 460 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 460 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP BESTSELLERS”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Track Your Order” and “Shop all”.

  • 16 short forms

    16 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and “Loved by 50,000+ customers”.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 38 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vimacosmetics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 15 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Geo Pro Geolocation · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Kaching Bundles · Triplewhale · Modash · Variant Image Wizard Swatch · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gempages Builder · Easylocation · Aftersell · Applovin Shop Integration · Section Factory · Kaching Popup · Deco Labels Badges · loox.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on vimacosmetics.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25