Website review, no card needed
vixbrasil.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202648 issues · 95 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on vixbrasil.com, 19 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65D- #101,155 of 108,857 reviewed websitesbeats 6%
- #59,567 of 61,765 online storesbeats 3%
- #54,716 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 2%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 545 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 462 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 443 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 439 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 458 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 511 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 511 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 516 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 538 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 522 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 517 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 510 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 471 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 441 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 417 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 245 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.0 s
3.0 s
4.1 s
5.1 s
6.1 s
7.1 s
8.1 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.8 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.0 s
A phone's processor spends 8.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 780 KiBAbout 780 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, TikTok and goadopt.io and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
700 ms · 682 KiB6 images could be 682 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
977 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (977 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
650 ms · 107 KiBAbout 107 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 409 ms
409 msFacebook costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 283 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 403 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
TikTok adds 254 ms
254 msTikTok costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 156 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,373 HTML elements
The page has 2,373 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Shopify adds 87 ms
87 msShopify costs a phone 87 ms of main-thread work and 404 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
34 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.0 s
11.0 sYour largest element takes 11.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Reproduzir ou pausar vídeo”.
Time to Interactive: 24.2 s
24.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.7 s
14.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.5 s
5.5 sThe first text or image appears after 5.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 335 ms
335 msReal visitors wait 335 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 52% faster for real visitors
-52%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 545 ms to 245 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 31% faster for real visitors
-31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022
0.022The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.5 MB in 265 requests
17.5 MBYour homepage downloads 17.5 MB in 265 requests on a phone: media 12.1 MB (1), scripts 2.1 MB (67) and images 2.0 MB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
vix-paula-hermanny-moda-praia-banner-principal-resort-27-mob is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (264 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.0 g of CO₂ per visit
4.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.96 g of CO₂e: 595.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
319 internal links, 29 external
The homepage links to 319 pages on vixbrasil.com and 29 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “ViX Paula Hermanny Brasil Swimwear e Resortwear: Moda Praia em Biquínis Sofisticados, Maiôs, Vestidos e mais, com desig…”.
Title: 49 characters
Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “ViX Paula Hermanny Brasil | Swimwear & Resortwear”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.vixbrasil.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vixbrasil.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,157 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.vixbrasil.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.vixbrasil.com/pages/catalogo-colecao-resort-27 and https://www.vixbrasil.com/pages/catalogo-colaboracao use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
14 pages without an H1
https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/new-in, https://www.vixbrasil.com/pages/catalogo-colecao-resort-27, https://www.vixbrasil.com/pages/catalogo-colaboracao, https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/praia, https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/biquinis-tops and https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/maios and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
9 pages with very little text
https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/new-in, https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/praia, https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/biquinis-tops, https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/maios, https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/saidas-de-praia and https://www.vixbrasil.com/collections/calcinha-brazilian and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 553 words of copy
The homepage carries about 553 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “SHOP NOW”, “SHOP WHITE” and “Download on the App Store”.
10 short forms
10 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
32 cookies set on arrival
32Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
44 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 44 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vixbrasil.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- adastra
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on vixbrasil.com, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.