Website review, no card needed
vk.ru website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202636 issues · 57 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on vk.ru, 11 of them high impact, across 57 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 7.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 8.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 607 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 531 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 488 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 467 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 445 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 426 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 418 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 421 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 434 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 444 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 462 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 479 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.8 s · 992 KiBAbout 992 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.0 s · 199 KiBAbout 199 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Avoid multiple page redirects
901 msThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 901 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1 checks passed
Server response: 135 ms
135 msYour server sent the HTML in 135 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.4 s
6.4 sReal visitors wait 6.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.3 s
17.3 sYour largest element takes 17.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 21.1 s
21.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.8 s
9.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 244 ms
244 msReal visitors wait 244 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 866 ms
866 msReal visitors wait 866 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 241 ms
241 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 241 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.9 s to 8.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 607 ms to 479 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.0 MB in 150 requests
3.0 MBYour homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 150 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (82), other files 249 KiB (39) and stylesheets 234 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.84 g of CO₂e: 100.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
4 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 7 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 4 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “VK.com | VK”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Canonical points to another host
Your canonical URL points to vk.ru, not m.vk.ru, so Google may credit that host instead.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://m.vk.ru/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 1 internal link
The homepage links to only 1 page on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
2 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Your browser is out of date”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“The `disableRemotePlayback` attribute should be used in order to disable the default Cast integrati…”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 27 words
The homepage has only about 27 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vk.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on vk.ru, including 15 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.