Website review, no card needed
walla.co.il website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202648 issues · 92 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on walla.co.il, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 37. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 313 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 316 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 233 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.1 s
3.2 s
4.2 s
5.3 s
6.3 s
7.4 s
8.4 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.6 s
A phone's processor spends 9.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,415 HTML elements
The page has 3,415 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Rubicon Project, Google Tag Manager and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 2.2 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
932 KiB141 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (932 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
850 ms14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
754 KiBAbout 754 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google Tag Manager adds 492 ms
492 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 492 ms of main-thread work and 637 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 483 ms
483 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 570 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Rubicon Project adds 522 ms
522 msRubicon Project costs a phone 522 ms of main-thread work and 149 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 346 ms
346 msFacebook costs a phone 346 ms of main-thread work and 409 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 312 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Pubmatic adds 276 ms
276 msPubmatic costs a phone 276 ms of main-thread work and 75 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
28 KiB3 images could be 28 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 310 ms
310 msYour server sent the HTML in 310 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 39.7 s
39.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sYour largest element takes 5.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “פגישת טראמפ נתניהו”.
Real-user INP: 238 ms
238 msReal visitors wait 238 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.184
0.184The layout shifts by 0.184 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 304 ms
304 msReal visitors wait 304 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors
-23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 313 ms to 233 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.0 MB in 1,145 requests
4.0 MBYour homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 1,145 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (126), other files 399 KiB (502) and fonts 395 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.14 g of CO₂e: 136.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
214 text elements with low contrast
214 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (19 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
15 tap targets too small
15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Positive tabindex
2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (88 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 88 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
120 internal links, 233 external
The homepage links to 120 pages on walla.co.il and 233 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 147 characters
Your meta description is 147 characters: “וואלה אתר החדשות הפופולרי בישראל. עדכונים, דיווחים ופרשנויות בעשרות ערוצי תוכן: חדשות, ספורט, מבזקים, סלבס, תרבות, אוכל…”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “וואלה חדשות. ספורט. סלבס. אוכל - עדכונים ודיווחים שוטפים”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.walla.co.il/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: NewsMediaOrganization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.walla.co.il/sitemap/index.xml.
AI search readiness
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
56%The HTML your server sends has 175 of the 310 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.walla.co.il/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.walla.co.il/entertainment/ontheagenda is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages share a title
https://www.walla.co.il/entertainment, https://www.walla.co.il/entertainment/moviesreview, https://www.walla.co.il/entertainment/music and https://www.walla.co.il/entertainment/ontheagenda all use the title “חדשות תרבות מהארץ והעולם, מוסיקה, טלוויזיה וקולנוע | וואלה תרבות”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.walla.co.il/news and https://www.walla.co.il/entertainment have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages with very little text
https://www.walla.co.il/news, https://www.walla.co.il/news/breaking-news, https://www.walla.co.il/news/military, https://www.walla.co.il/news/israel, https://www.walla.co.il/news/politics and https://www.walla.co.il/news/world and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://sync.intentiq.com/profiles_engine/ProfilesEngineServlet?at=20&mi=10&secure=1&dpi=undefined&iiqidtype=2&iiqpcid=ae5d80e7-e9bc-4e96-b2c1-766a78ffb9d3&iiqpciddate=1793719107931&tsrnd=599_17937191.
81 small tap targets
81 of 145 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
27 third-party cookies
27 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 310 words of copy
The homepage carries about 310 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
107 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 107 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at walla.co.il, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Company
- Founded
- 1995
- Headquarters
- Tel Aviv
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on walla.co.il, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.