Website review, no card needed
warchild.nl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202621 issues · 79 checks
This review found 21 issues worth fixing on warchild.nl, 8 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 210 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.9 s
2.8 s
3.7 s
4.6 s
5.6 s
6.5 s
7.4 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 88
88/100Your mobile performance score is 88 (desktop: 68). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
850 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).
Render-blocking requests
700 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 700 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
651 KiBAbout 651 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
420 ms · 36 KiBAbout 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 420 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, reddit and Bing Ads and others), adding 359 KiB and 182 ms of main-thread time.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
45 KiB45 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
31 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (31 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 532 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 10.4 s
10.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.6 s
12.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 228 ms
228 msReal visitors wait 228 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors
+36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 210 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 662 ms
662 msReal visitors wait 662 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sYour largest element renders in 2.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “DONEER EEN STUKJE RUST.”.
Total Blocking Time: 121 ms
121 msScripts block the page for only 121 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.52 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.52 g of CO₂e: 62.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.8 MB in 46 requests
1.8 MBYour homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 46 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (13), images 344 KiB (15) and fonts 264 KiB (6). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
27 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 31 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
34 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 34 pages on warchild.nl and 13 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Op onze veilige plekken kunnen kinderen op adem komen en herstellen van wat ze hebben meegemaakt. Help mee. Doneer ook …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Doneer een stukje rust.”.
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Doneer een stukje rust | War Child”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.warchild.nl/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.warchild.nl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.warchild.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; name and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (516 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
11 pages slow to respond
https://www.warchild.nl/onderwijs, https://www.warchild.nl/bescherming, https://www.warchild.nl/onderzoek, https://www.warchild.nl/hier-werken-wij, https://www.warchild.nl/doneren and https://www.warchild.nl/nalaten and 5 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=97133593&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=7ee606cc-a0ec-44c4-85dc-346534215b0e&bo=2&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Doneer%20een%20stukje%20rust%20%7C%20War%20Ch.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
8 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 436 words of copy
The homepage carries about 436 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at warchild.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Vue.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 21 issues on warchild.nl, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.