Website review, no card needed

waschbaer.de logo

waschbaer.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202646 issues · 90 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on waschbaer.de, 18 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
145 ms119 msMay 2Oct 17129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026122 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026126 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026133 ms
Jun 20, 2026133 ms
Jun 27, 2026132 ms
Jul 4, 2026135 ms
Jul 11, 2026133 ms
Jul 18, 2026133 ms
Jul 25, 2026134 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026139 ms
Aug 15, 2026142 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026134 ms
Sep 19, 2026135 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of waschbaer.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. waschbaer.de at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. waschbaer.de at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. waschbaer.de at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. waschbaer.de at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. waschbaer.de at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. waschbaer.de at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. waschbaer.de at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. waschbaer.de at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

13 to fix23
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.3 s · 700 KiB

    About 700 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 23

    23/100

    Your mobile performance score is 23 (desktop: 31). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5,202 HTML elements

    The page has 5,202 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, trbo.com and consentmanager.net and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 488 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (488 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1,023 KiB

    19 images could be 1,023 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 801 ms

    801 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 801 ms of main-thread work and 720 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 377 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • trbo.com adds 333 ms

    333 ms

    trbo.com costs a phone 333 ms of main-thread work and 248 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • consentmanager.net adds 312 ms

    312 ms

    consentmanager.net costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 135 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 108 KiB

    About 108 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 111 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.60

    0.60

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.2 s

    13.2 s

    Your largest element takes 13.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Bekleidung.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.4 s

    17.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.662

    0.662

    The layout shifts by 0.662 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 861 ms

    861 ms

    Real visitors wait 861 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 34 images without width and height

    34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 193 ms

    193 ms

    Real visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 11.5 MB in 219 requests

    11.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 219 requests on a phone: images 9.6 MB (112), scripts 1.6 MB (49) and fonts 162 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 4.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (7.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (26 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.27 g of CO₂e: 392.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8491
  • Hidden but focusable

    26 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (28 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 102 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10081
  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “Waschbär – Der Umweltversand”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Nachhaltige Produkte für einen bewussten Alltag” and “Herzlich willkommen im Onlineshop vom Waschbär.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Organization and SiteNavigationElement) but with 2 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 200 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 200 pages on waschbaer.de and 4 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “Waschbär begleitet Sie zu einem nachhaltigeren Alltag. Entdecken Sie ökologische Produkte und pragmatische Lösungen für…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.waschbaer.de/startseite/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.froelichundkaufmann.de/export/mgm_sitemap_shop1.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.waschbaer.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (882 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix75
  • 3 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.waschbaer.de/kontakt, https://www.waschbaer.de/newsletter and https://www.waschbaer.de/warenkorb are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    / and https://www.waschbaer.de/startseite all use the title “Waschbär – Der Umweltversand”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://www.waschbaer.de/online-katalog, https://www.waschbaer.de/kontakt, https://www.waschbaer.de/online-bestellschein, https://www.waschbaer.de/newsletter, https://www.waschbaer.de/warenkorb and https://www.waschbaer.de/geschenk-gutscheine and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.waschbaer.de/kontakt, https://www.waschbaer.de/online-bestellschein and https://www.waschbaer.de/warenkorb have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=134595907&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=c5a63951-d0ca-483e-a788-abe2a07e9e5f&bo=8&sid=9d76ac80cbf011f1af21c938b1c9deb0&vid=9d7706e0cbf011f19e21d55255dba700&vids=0&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 31 small tap targets

    31 of 83 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,210 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,210 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “ONLINE SHOP” and “Shop”.

  • 38 short forms

    38 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at waschbaer.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1987
Headquarters
Freiburg im Breisgau

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on waschbaer.de, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25