Website review, no card needed

weareshadow.com logo

weareshadow.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202636 issues · 74 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on weareshadow.com, 7 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: website-files.com adds 1.3 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of weareshadow.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. weareshadow.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. weareshadow.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. weareshadow.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. weareshadow.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. weareshadow.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. weareshadow.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. weareshadow.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. weareshadow.com at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

9 to fix67
  • website-files.com adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    website-files.com costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 14.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 13.5 MB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13.5 MB).

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Clarity and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 14.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 273 KiB

    About 273 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 405 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,078 HTML elements

    The page has 2,078 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    18 KiB

    1 image could be 18 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix70
  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Your largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • 51 images without width and height

    51 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 321 ms

    321 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 321 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.055

    0.055

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.055, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 14.9 MB in 64 requests

    14.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.9 MB in 64 requests on a phone: media 13.4 MB (4), images 620 KiB (15) and scripts 609 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.21 g of CO₂e: 505.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9496
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 155 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10078
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 12 H1 headlines

    There are 12 <h1> headlines (“Creative Strategy”, “Creative Strategy” and “Media Relations”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (214 characters)

    Your meta description is 214 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.weareshadow.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 69 internal links, 39 external

    The homepage links to 69 pages on weareshadow.com and 39 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “SHADOW | Creative Marketing & Communications”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.weareshadow.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,202 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 4 pages share a title

    https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/shadow-creates-the-first-spaceship-going-to-mars, https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/ipsum-doirum-lorem-oliuyrm, https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/lorem-ipsum-dolor-set-orium-ipsum and https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/shadow-partners-with-elf-to-lorem-ipsum-dolor all use the title “SHADOW”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/major-moisture-matchup, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/feel-whats-possible, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/bottle-service, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/judge-beauty, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/spring-try-guide and https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/pat-mcgrath-labs-x-shop-with-google and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/major-moisture-matchup, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/feel-whats-possible, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/bottle-service, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/judge-beauty, https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/spring-try-guide and https://www.weareshadow.com/projects/pat-mcgrath-labs-x-shop-with-google and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/shadow-creates-the-first-spaceship-going-to-mars, https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/lorem-ipsum-dolor-set-orium-ipsum and https://www.weareshadow.com/feed/shadow-partners-with-elf-to-lorem-ipsum-dolor have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 47 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 158 words

    The homepage has only about 158 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at weareshadow.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on weareshadow.com, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25