Website review, no card needed
weareteam.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202628 issues · 78 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on weareteam.com, 4 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 26.6 MB in 135 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
88BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 763 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 774 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 814 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 719 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 746 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 744 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 752 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 769 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 733 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 720 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 826 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 919 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 884 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 798 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 704 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 686 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 730 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 802 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 791 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 816 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 820 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 851 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 956 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 910 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 922 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 76 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 73 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 76 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 81 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Vimeo, website-files.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 26.6 MB and 501 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 163 ms
163 msVimeo costs a phone 163 ms of main-thread work and 17.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
1.0 MB4 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
website-files.com adds 148 ms
148 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 8.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 85
85/100Your mobile performance score is 85. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
721 KiBAbout 721 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 110 KiB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (110 KiB).
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 134 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
10 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 21.0 s
21.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.2 s
9.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 226 ms
226 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 226 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 76 ms to 81 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 79 ms
79 msReal visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 421 ms
421 msReal visitors wait 421 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sYour largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “MADE TO EXPERIENCE”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023
0.023The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 26.6 MB in 135 requests
26.6 MBYour homepage downloads 26.6 MB in 135 requests on a phone: other files 16.6 MB (33), images 6.8 MB (53) and fonts 1.7 MB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (448 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 7.5 g of CO₂ per visit
7.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.54 g of CO₂e: 905.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “TEAM - Made To Experience”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
86 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 86 pages on weareteam.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “From big idea to execution, TEAM designs and delivers brand experiences that make impactful connections and create last…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “made to experience”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.weareteam.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.weareteam.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.weareteam.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page with very little text
https://www.weareteam.com/contact has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “An error has been thrown while configuring your widget AbortError: signal is aborted without reason AbortError: signal …”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 15 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 142 words
The homepage has only about 142 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “contact” and “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at weareteam.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Webflow
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on weareteam.com, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.