Website review, no card needed

wearlively.com logo

wearlively.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202646 issues · 90 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on wearlively.com, 19 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 23Nov 71.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Nov 7, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
99 ms70 msMay 23Nov 795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202673 ms
May 30, 202677 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jun 13, 202680 ms
Jun 20, 202682 ms
Jun 27, 202684 ms
Jul 4, 202682 ms
Jul 11, 202685 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202689 ms
Aug 8, 202688 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202690 ms
Aug 29, 202688 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202689 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 202692 ms
Oct 3, 202688 ms
Oct 10, 202689 ms
Oct 17, 202693 ms
Oct 24, 202689 ms
Oct 31, 202696 ms
Nov 7, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wearlively.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wearlively.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. wearlively.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. wearlively.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. wearlively.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. wearlively.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. wearlively.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. wearlively.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. wearlively.com at 7.5 s7.5 s

Speed

13 to fix45
  • Improve image delivery

    3.8 s · 3.9 MB

    72 images could be 3.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 633 KiB

    About 633 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,893 HTML elements

    The page has 4,893 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Bazaarvoice and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 264 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (264 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 392 ms

    392 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 392 ms of main-thread work and 320 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 77 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 77 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 336 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Klaviyo adds 254 ms

    254 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 400 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Optanon adds 205 ms

    205 ms

    Optanon costs a phone 205 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 89 KiB

    About 89 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 20 ms

    20 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.5 s

    23.5 s

    Your largest element takes 23.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This website uses tracking technologies to enable our websi…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.0 s

    26.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 968 ms

    968 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 968 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 73 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 908 ms

    908 ms

    Real visitors wait 908 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 29 images without width and height

    29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 7.9 MB in 317 requests

    7.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 317 requests on a phone: images 4.9 MB (85), scripts 1.8 MB (96) and other files 849 KiB (118). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 39 images far larger than shown

    1.7 MB

    39 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1_on_model_910182_004_V2_1_1024x.progressive.jpg at 877 px wide, shown at 190 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.

  • 16 images below the first screen load straight away

    16 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (80 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 267.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7884
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (708 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 708 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 154 tap targets too small

    154 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    36 dropdowns have no label.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 40 form fields without a label

    40 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (36 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 283 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 283 pages on wearlively.com and 14 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “Discover our best selling bras, bralettes, and panties, loved and reviewed by real customers. Find your new everyday fa…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “best sellers”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Best Selling Bras, Bralettes & Panties | b.tempt'd by Wacoal”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://shopbtemptd.com/collections/best-sellers.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://shopbtemptd.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,131 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://shopbtemptd.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://shopbtemptd.com/pages/accessibility-statement and / have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://shopbtemptd.com/collections/best-sellers-bras, https://shopbtemptd.com/collections/best-sellers-panties, https://shopbtemptd.com/collections/bralette and https://shopbtemptd.com/collections/strapless-bras took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 121 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 51 small tap targets

    51 of 98 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,441 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,441 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SIGN UP FOR EMAIL AND GET 10% OFF”.

  • 23 calls to action

    The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “new arrivals shop now”, “future foundation t-shirt bra shop now” and “t-shirt bras shop now”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wearlively.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Onetrust Consent Management · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Judge Me Reviews · searchserverapi1.com · rise-ai.com · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on wearlively.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25