Website review, no card needed

wearpact.com logo

wearpact.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202638 issues · 85 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on wearpact.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.2 sApr 18Oct 32.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.3 s
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
200 ms164 msApr 18Oct 3189 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026174 ms
Apr 25, 2026171 ms
May 2, 2026170 ms
May 9, 2026169 ms
May 16, 2026168 ms
May 23, 2026170 ms
May 30, 2026171 ms
Jun 6, 2026177 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026182 ms
Jun 27, 2026187 ms
Jul 4, 2026185 ms
Jul 11, 2026182 ms
Jul 18, 2026180 ms
Jul 25, 2026181 ms
Aug 1, 2026185 ms
Aug 8, 2026187 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026188 ms
Aug 29, 2026193 ms
Sep 5, 2026195 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026195 ms
Sep 26, 2026193 ms
Oct 3, 2026189 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wearpact.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wearpact.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. wearpact.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  3. wearpact.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  4. wearpact.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  5. wearpact.com at 6.9 s6.9 s
  6. wearpact.com at 8.2 s8.2 s
  7. wearpact.com at 9.6 s9.6 s
  8. wearpact.com at 11.0 s11.0 s

Speed

13 to fix27
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    13.5 s · 3.0 MB

    57 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    12.0 s · 1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    10.2 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 10.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27 (desktop: 33). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, alia-prod.com and wearpact.io and others), adding 3.3 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 277 KiB

    7 images could be 277 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 674 ms

    674 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 674 ms of main-thread work and 966 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • wearpact.io adds 557 ms

    557 ms

    wearpact.io costs a phone 557 ms of main-thread work and 796 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • alia-prod.com adds 566 ms

    566 ms

    alia-prod.com costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 673 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 91 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 91 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 397 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 281 ms

    281 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 281 ms of main-thread work and 315 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    220 ms · 119 KiB

    About 119 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 220 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 12.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 47.9 s

    47.9 s

    Your largest element takes 47.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “00:08 A LITTLE GIFT TO GET YOU STARTED YOU'VE GOT $30 OFF $…”.

  • Speed Index: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 48.1 s

    48.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 48.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 29 images without width and height

    29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 174 ms to 189 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Real visitors wait 177 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 721 ms

    721 ms

    Real visitors wait 721 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 8.6 MB in 250 requests

    8.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.6 MB in 250 requests on a phone: scripts 4.5 MB (87), images 2.3 MB (27) and other files 958 KiB (105). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (544 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.44 g of CO₂e: 292.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9495
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10077
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “Pact | Dress Yourself Well”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Only 1 internal link

    The homepage links to only 1 page on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 139 characters

    Your meta description is 139 characters: “Pact is the leading brand in Sustainable & Ethical Clothing - Organic Cotton, Fair Trade & Carbon Neutral. Visit Pact o…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://wearpact.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wearpact.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    2%

    A phone browser shows 569 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 14. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://wearpact.com/llms.txt (68 KiB, 260 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 1 internal page checked

    We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 5491
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    73 of 74 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 569 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 569 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “history Order History”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wearpact.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on wearpact.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25