Website review, no card needed

websouls.com logo

websouls.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202628 issues · 76 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on websouls.com, 7 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.7 s3.5 sMay 2Oct 173.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20265.5 s
May 9, 20265.4 s
May 16, 20265.3 s
May 23, 20265.3 s
May 30, 20265.3 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.9 s
Jul 11, 20264.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.9 s
Jul 25, 20265.0 s
Aug 1, 20265.1 s
Aug 8, 20265.1 s
Aug 15, 20265.1 s
Aug 22, 20265.2 s
Aug 29, 20265.1 s
Sep 5, 20265.2 s
Sep 12, 20265.2 s
Sep 19, 20265.2 s
Sep 26, 20265.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.9 s
Oct 10, 20264.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
310 ms261 msMay 2Oct 17282 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026267 ms
May 9, 2026270 ms
May 16, 2026275 ms
May 23, 2026277 ms
May 30, 2026285 ms
Jun 6, 2026296 ms
Jun 13, 2026299 ms
Jun 20, 2026304 ms
Jun 27, 2026301 ms
Jul 4, 2026296 ms
Jul 11, 2026297 ms
Jul 18, 2026298 ms
Jul 25, 2026301 ms
Aug 1, 2026303 ms
Aug 8, 2026301 ms
Aug 15, 2026301 ms
Aug 22, 2026299 ms
Aug 29, 2026300 ms
Sep 5, 2026296 ms
Sep 12, 2026296 ms
Sep 19, 2026295 ms
Sep 26, 2026291 ms
Oct 3, 2026293 ms
Oct 10, 2026286 ms
Oct 17, 2026282 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of websouls.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. websouls.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. websouls.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. websouls.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. websouls.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. websouls.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. websouls.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. websouls.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. websouls.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

3 to fix76
  • Mobile performance score: 76

    76/100

    Your mobile performance score is 76 (desktop: 98). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,533 HTML elements

    The page has 1,533 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 76 KiB

    About 76 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 91 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    16 KiB

    1 image could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 369 ms

    369 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 369 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.28

    0.28

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Banner Slide 1”.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 273 ms

    273 ms

    Real visitors wait 273 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.131

    0.131

    The layout shifts by 0.131 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 267 ms to 282 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 87 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.30 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.30 g of CO₂e: 35.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.0 MB in 67 requests

    1.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 67 requests on a phone: scripts 456 KiB (29), fonts 276 KiB (11) and other files 125 KiB (16). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9392
  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 43 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8595
  • 6 links crawlers can't follow

    6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 34 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on websouls.com and 1 external page.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Launch, manage & grow your online presence with trusted digital solutions from Websouls. Trusted since 2002. Enjoy …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Fast Web Hosting”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Web Hosting, Domains & AI Website Builder | Websouls Pakistan”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://websouls.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FAQPage and Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://websouls.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,417 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (13 KiB, 106 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix58
  • 4 pages without a title

    /pk/domain/domain-registration, /pk/hosting/web-hosting, /pk/hosting/vps-hosting and /hosting/web-hosting have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    /pk declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /pk all use the title “Web Hosting, Domains & AI Website Builder | Websouls Pakistan”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /pk/domain/domain-registration, /pk/hosting/web-hosting, /pk/hosting/vps-hosting and /hosting/web-hosting have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /clients has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /clients has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js/vce701823e78c4301a35b7e07294d87301792088814092'…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • About 1,717 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,717 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Call us”, “Get Started” and “Request Free Migration”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at websouls.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on websouls.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25