Website review, no card needed

wedonthavetime.org logo

wedonthavetime.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202648 issues · 82 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on wedonthavetime.org, 20 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.1 s4.3 sMay 9Oct 244.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.5 s
May 16, 20265.5 s
May 23, 20265.7 s
May 30, 20265.9 s
Jun 6, 20265.4 s
Jun 13, 20264.9 s
Jun 20, 20264.8 s
Jun 27, 20264.6 s
Jul 4, 20264.8 s
Jul 11, 20264.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.6 s
Aug 8, 20264.6 s
Aug 15, 20264.6 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.6 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.6 s
Sep 19, 20264.6 s
Sep 26, 20264.6 s
Oct 3, 20264.7 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Oct 17, 20264.7 s
Oct 24, 20264.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
508 ms194 msMay 9Oct 24289 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026244 ms
May 16, 2026429 ms
May 23, 2026472 ms
May 30, 2026472 ms
Jun 6, 2026437 ms
Jun 13, 2026347 ms
Jun 20, 2026309 ms
Jun 27, 2026298 ms
Jul 4, 2026316 ms
Jul 11, 2026322 ms
Jul 18, 2026318 ms
Jul 25, 2026329 ms
Aug 1, 2026287 ms
Aug 8, 2026264 ms
Aug 15, 2026261 ms
Aug 22, 2026230 ms
Aug 29, 2026262 ms
Sep 5, 2026268 ms
Sep 12, 2026254 ms
Sep 19, 2026264 ms
Sep 26, 2026264 ms
Oct 3, 2026269 ms
Oct 10, 2026271 ms
Oct 17, 2026274 ms
Oct 24, 2026289 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wedonthavetime.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wedonthavetime.org at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. wedonthavetime.org at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. wedonthavetime.org at 3.6 s3.6 s
  4. wedonthavetime.org at 4.8 s4.8 s
  5. wedonthavetime.org at 6.0 s6.0 s
  6. wedonthavetime.org at 7.2 s7.2 s
  7. wedonthavetime.org at 8.4 s8.4 s
  8. wedonthavetime.org at 9.7 s9.7 s

Speed

14 to fix25
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 4.6 MB

    About 4.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • hcaptcha.com adds 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    hcaptcha.com costs a phone 2.4 s of main-thread work and 2.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 16.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 16.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google CDN adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 2.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 11.9 MB

    123 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11.9 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (hcaptcha.com, Google CDN and donorbox.org and others), adding 11.6 MB and 6.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 2.5 MB

    25 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • donorbox.org adds 695 ms

    695 ms

    donorbox.org costs a phone 695 ms of main-thread work and 3.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 954 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Stripe adds 619 ms

    619 ms

    Stripe costs a phone 619 ms of main-thread work and 608 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 466 ms

    466 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 466 ms of main-thread work and 799 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 246 KiB

    About 246 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 350 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 494 ms

    494 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 494 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Real visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 553 ms

    553 ms

    Real visitors wait 553 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.6 s

    16.6 s

    Your largest element takes 16.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The World's Largest Media Platform for Climate ActionWelcom…”.

  • Speed Index: 39.3 s

    39.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 39.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 146.9 s

    146.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 146.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 244 ms to 289 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix0
  • Page weight: 37.4 MB in 687 requests

    37.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 37.4 MB in 687 requests on a phone: scripts 20.3 MB (292), images 11.8 MB (97) and fonts 1.8 MB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 10.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.61 g of CO₂e: 1273.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fix75
  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 links without text

    7 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7581
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“"Dear UN Ambassador, Political leadership has a c…” and “Join the world's largest climate solution network”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://api.wedonthavetime.org/sitemap/static/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 27 internal links, 38 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on wedonthavetime.org and 38 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Get climate news in one place, give reviews to influence society and reach leaders to discuss solutions. Join for free,…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “The World’s Largest Media Platform for Climate Action”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://app.wedonthavetime.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 1 page without a title

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/frontpage/energyefficiencyaction has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 10 pages share 2 titles

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/?utm_source=wwwredirect, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/home/filter and https://app.wedonthavetime.org/play all use the title “The World’s Largest Media Platform for Climate Action”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/frontpage/energyefficiencyaction has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/home/filter, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/home/all, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/play, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/3a1a742e-4b07-423a-b506-63f7f99ccdaf, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/6cf5394a-5f42-482f-b075-b9f06c9db210 and https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/afc414a1-2c59-433b-9940-3596f68bd785 and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/home/filter, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/home/all, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/3a1a742e-4b07-423a-b506-63f7f99ccdaf, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/6cf5394a-5f42-482f-b075-b9f06c9db210, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/frontpage/energyefficiencyaction and https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/afc414a1-2c59-433b-9940-3596f68bd785 and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/home/filter and https://app.wedonthavetime.org/frontpage/energyefficiencyaction have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/6cf5394a-5f42-482f-b075-b9f06c9db210, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/9fe64be2-2adc-4656-a461-c0547922682b, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/73a042db-d6ad-48fb-9354-d1b95962c461, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/2073af0c-6113-4fa8-b6e7-328e5a55778e and https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/f579875c-ab4d-47e5-85f8-6453908a7b28 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5484
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 8 console errors

    8 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Error: Minified React error #418; visit https://reactjs.org/docs/error-decoder.html?invariant=418 f…”).

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,111 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,111 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wedonthavetime.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Hosting
Webflow

Company

Founded
2017
Headquarters
Stockholm

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on wedonthavetime.org, including 25 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25