Website review, no card needed
weekampdeuren.nl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202640 issues · 107 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on weekampdeuren.nl, 15 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #31,165 of 81,485 reviewed websitesbeats 56%
- #18,452 of 40,337 online storesbeats 48%
- #99 of 601 Magento storesbeats 80%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 601 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 567 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 566 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 563 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 570 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 576 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 586 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 623 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 624 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 652 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 664 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 651 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 651 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 662 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 678 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 685 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 669 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 660 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 630 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 599 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 606 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 619 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 628 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 641 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 640 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 107 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 121 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
weekampdeuren.nl does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.7 s · 4.3 MB14 images could be 4.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Optanon and others), adding 1.0 MB and 907 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 68). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 417 KiBAbout 417 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 548 ms
548 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 548 ms of main-thread work and 517 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 212 KiB212 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 98 KiBAbout 98 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 246 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
66 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (66 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 96 ms
96 msYour server sent the HTML in 96 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.2 s
18.2 sYour largest element takes 18.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ontdek onze deurenseries Perfect passend. Welkom thuis. Bin…”.
Time to Interactive: 41.9 s
41.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.9 s
12.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 461 ms
461 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 461 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 107 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.6 s to 0.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 297 ms
297 msReal visitors wait 297 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.019
0.019The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.019, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.6 MB in 321 requests
11.6 MBYour homepage downloads 11.6 MB in 321 requests on a phone: images 9.2 MB (32), scripts 1.5 MB (220) and fonts 783 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 5.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
17 images in older formats
17 images (7.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
6 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Weekamp-Magazine-mockup.jpg at 1,000 px wide, shown at 311 px. Resized copies would save about 6 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (76 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.30 g of CO₂e: 395.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (14 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (189 characters)
Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
55 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 55 pages on weekampdeuren.nl and 14 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 49 characters
Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “Weekamp Deuren | Houten deuren | Binnen en buiten”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.weekampdeuren.nl/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.weekampdeuren.nl/sitemaps/sitemap_consumer.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (871 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
/over-weekamp, /service, /contact, /voordeuren and /binnendeuren have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /diensten/weekamp-montageservice, whose canonical is /service/weekamp-montageservice. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/informatie has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
/dealers, /service, /informatie and /inspiratie have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
/diensten/weekamp-montageservice took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (weekampdeuren.nl).
Valid certificate (68 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for weekampdeuren.nl and is valid for another 68 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
http:// redirects to https
http://weekampdeuren.nl redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 43 links work
All 43 links checked from your homepage (33 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
weekampdeuren.nl has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
2 checks passed
Domain is 21 years old
21 yearsweekampdeuren.nl was registered in Jul 2005 through KPN B.V.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
weekampdeuren.nl's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 804 words of copy
The homepage carries about 804 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be weekampdeuren.nl is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 IP4:84.241.182.106 IP6:2001:1690:2:416::167 ip4:94.76.254.59 ip6:2a01:7c8:bb0a:18c:5054:ff:fea1:b755 ip4:212.78.…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 40 issues on weekampdeuren.nl, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.