Website review, no card needed

wellpeople.com logo

wellpeople.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202640 issues · 83 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on wellpeople.com, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
198 ms155 msMay 16Oct 31186 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026162 ms
May 23, 2026160 ms
May 30, 2026162 ms
Jun 6, 2026171 ms
Jun 13, 2026175 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026180 ms
Jul 4, 2026179 ms
Jul 11, 2026179 ms
Jul 18, 2026179 ms
Jul 25, 2026178 ms
Aug 1, 2026178 ms
Aug 8, 2026178 ms
Aug 15, 2026180 ms
Aug 22, 2026181 ms
Aug 29, 2026187 ms
Sep 5, 2026189 ms
Sep 12, 2026189 ms
Sep 19, 2026193 ms
Sep 26, 2026191 ms
Oct 3, 2026181 ms
Oct 10, 2026179 ms
Oct 17, 2026179 ms
Oct 24, 2026179 ms
Oct 31, 2026186 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wellpeople.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wellpeople.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. wellpeople.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. wellpeople.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. wellpeople.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. wellpeople.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  6. wellpeople.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  7. wellpeople.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  8. wellpeople.com at 8.9 s8.9 s

Speed

16 to fix42
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 2.6 MB

    43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.6 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 607 KiB

    About 607 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Signyfyd adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Signyfyd costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 265 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Signyfyd, Google Tag Manager and Shopify and others), adding 4.5 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    984 KiB

    16 images could be 984 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 798 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 563 ms

    563 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 563 ms of main-thread work and 685 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    550 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    450 ms · 100 KiB

    100 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    410 ms · 97 KiB

    About 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 410 ms faster on a phone.

  • vidjet.io adds 153 ms

    153 ms

    vidjet.io costs a phone 153 ms of main-thread work and 2.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Shopify adds 215 ms

    215 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 215 ms of main-thread work and 808 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,329 HTML elements

    The page has 2,329 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.9 s

    13.9 s

    Your largest element takes 13.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.8 s

    24.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 851 ms

    851 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 851 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 186 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 157 ms

    157 ms

    Real visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 505 ms

    505 ms

    Real visitors wait 505 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 8.9 MB in 329 requests

    8.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.9 MB in 329 requests on a phone: media 3.6 MB (4), scripts 2.0 MB (115) and images 1.7 MB (66). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (827 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    113 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example kustomer-icon-wp_1.gif at 390 px wide, shown at 49 px. Resized copies would save about 113 KiB.

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.53 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.53 g of CO₂e: 304.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (75 characters)

    Your title is 75 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Well People: Clean Beauty, Award Winning Makeup and Skin Care | Well People”.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Well People”, “Enter a Gleamstate” and “Lash Expression,”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 161 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 161 pages on wellpeople.com and 20 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “Well People is EWG certified, cruelty free and vegan makeup and skincare for all skin types. Try our Award-winning clea…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wellpeople.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wellpeople.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,444 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.wellpeople.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.wellpeople.com/blogs/articles has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.wellpeople.com/products/gleamstate-brightening-serum-concealer, https://www.wellpeople.com/blogs/articles, https://www.wellpeople.com/pages/about-us and https://www.wellpeople.com/pages/find-your-shade have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 36 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 448 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 448 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now” and “SHOP NOW”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Shop” and “Shop All”.

  • 11 short forms

    11 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 37 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wellpeople.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
10 Shopify Products;Demandware;Salesforce Commerce Cloud;Shopify;Shopify Plus

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on wellpeople.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25