Website review, no card needed

weme.nu logo

weme.nu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202623 issues · 73 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on weme.nu, 5 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: page is set to noindex. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 32.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
792 ms220 msMay 2Oct 3662 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026336 ms
May 9, 2026342 ms
May 16, 2026392 ms
May 23, 2026438 ms
May 30, 2026403 ms
Jun 6, 2026417 ms
Jun 13, 2026399 ms
Jun 20, 2026389 ms
Jun 27, 2026379 ms
Jul 4, 2026354 ms
Jul 11, 2026331 ms
Jul 18, 2026286 ms
Jul 25, 2026321 ms
Aug 1, 2026343 ms
Aug 8, 2026318 ms
Aug 15, 2026321 ms
Aug 22, 2026309 ms
Aug 29, 2026323 ms
Sep 5, 2026375 ms
Sep 12, 2026425 ms
Sep 19, 2026629 ms
Sep 26, 2026726 ms
Oct 3, 2026662 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of weme.nu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. weme.nu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. weme.nu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. weme.nu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. weme.nu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. weme.nu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. weme.nu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. weme.nu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. weme.nu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix76
  • Mobile performance score: 76

    76/100

    Your mobile performance score is 76 (desktop: 100). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 280 KiB

    About 280 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Analytics), adding 588 KiB and 641 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 393 ms

    393 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 393 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 249 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    235 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (235 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    30 KiB

    2 images could be 30 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 742 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix70
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Usamos cookies para aprimorar sua experiência de navegação,…”.

  • Tap response (INP) got 105% slower for real visitors

    +105%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 336 ms to 662 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% slower for real visitors

    +44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 462 ms

    462 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 462 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Speed Index: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.28 g of CO₂e: 34.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.0 MB in 27 requests

    1.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 27 requests on a phone: scripts 778 KiB (12), images 91 KiB (8) and fonts 90 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

Google 100100
2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 6954
  • Page is set to noindex

    The robots meta tag says “noindex, nofollow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.

  • Blocked from indexing

    Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.

  • Title is short (22 characters)

    Your title is only 22 characters: “BRQ | Weme agora é BRQ”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Canonical points to another host

    Your canonical URL points to dj88sgccocoj4.cloudfront.net, not brq.com, so Google may credit that host instead.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://dj88sgccocoj4.cloudfront.net)”.

  • 81 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 81 pages on weme.nu and 11 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 112 characters

    Your meta description is 112 characters: “A fusão da weme com a BRQ cria um novo estúdio de produto e experiência, unindo estratégia, design e engenharia.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Weme agora é BRQ”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.brq.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (701 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.brq.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 23 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 15 linked pages hidden from search

    /, https://www.brq.com/carreiras, https://www.brq.com/contato, https://www.brq.com/sobre, https://www.brq.com/premios-e-rankings and https://www.brq.com/innovation-hub and 9 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 449 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 449 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at weme.nu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on weme.nu, including 10 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25