Website review, no card needed
wemind.se website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202622 issues · 70 checks
This review found 22 issues worth fixing on wemind.se, 9 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 809 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 798 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 792 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 809 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 827 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 829 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 854 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 898 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 936 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 947 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 949 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 934 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 921 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 928 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 900 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 871 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 859 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 836 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 826 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 854 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 841 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 871 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 863 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 842 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 844 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 83 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 89 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.2 s · 1.9 MB8 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.2 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 320 KiBAbout 320 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 69
69/100Your mobile performance score is 69. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 387 ms
387 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 387 ms of main-thread work and 641 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Bing Ads and others), adding 691 KiB and 459 ms of main-thread time.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 114 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
10 KiBAbout 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 507 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s
17.8 sYour largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Välkommen till WeMind – vi arbetar för psykisk hälsa! Vi be…”.
Time to Interactive: 17.8 s
17.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.9 s
5.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 83 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 86 ms
86 msReal visitors wait 86 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.7 s
0.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 403 ms
403 msReal visitors wait 403 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 112 ms
112 msScripts block the page for only 112 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011
0.011The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.0 s
1.0 sThe first text or image appears after 1.0 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.1 MB in 36 requests
3.1 MBYour homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 36 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (10), scripts 728 KiB (12) and fonts 47 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
8 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 11 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 8 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (6 characters)
Your title is only 6 characters: “WeMind”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
70 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 70 pages on wemind.se and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “Psykiatrisk vård med effektiva behandlingsmetoder och mätbara resultat. WeMind driver psykiatrisk vård på öppenvårdsmot…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Välkommen till WeMind – vi arbetar för psykisk hälsa!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://wemind.se/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: LocalBusiness, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wemind.se/sitemaps.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://wemind.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 5 words
The homepage has only about 5 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wemind.se, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Combell
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 22 issues on wemind.se, including 9 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.