Website review, no card needed

weoneil.com logo

weoneil.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202633 issues · 84 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on weoneil.com, 12 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms91 msMay 9Oct 24104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026111 ms
May 16, 2026111 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026116 ms
Jun 20, 2026103 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 2026110 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026116 ms
Aug 1, 2026116 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026121 ms
Aug 22, 2026119 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026129 ms
Sep 12, 2026126 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026116 ms
Oct 3, 2026109 ms
Oct 10, 2026109 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of weoneil.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. weoneil.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. weoneil.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. weoneil.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. weoneil.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. weoneil.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. weoneil.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. weoneil.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. weoneil.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

6 to fix54
  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 s · 1,013 KiB

    6 images could be 1,013 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 207 KiB

    About 207 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 201 ms

    201 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 201 ms of main-thread work and 325 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,799 HTML elements

    The page has 1,799 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudflare.com and userway.org and others), adding 604 KiB and 288 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 126 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    45 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (45 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 550 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.0 s

    28.0 s

    Your largest element takes 28.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.4 s

    28.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • 64 images without width and height

    64 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.131

    0.131

    The layout shifts by 0.131 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 603 ms

    603 ms

    Real visitors wait 603 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 78 ms

    78 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 78 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix42
  • Page weight: 13.7 MB in 122 requests

    13.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.7 MB in 122 requests on a phone: media 8.5 MB (1), images 2.4 MB (54) and other files 1.3 MB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    pic-1-1-new3-512x404.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (924 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    300 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Super-nav_opt-1-2-scaled.jpg at 1,828 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 300 KiB.

  • About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.89 g of CO₂e: 466.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8391
  • Hidden but focusable

    5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 33 images without alt text

    33 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 92100
  • 261 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 261 pages on weoneil.com and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “W.E. O'Neil Construction is a 100% employee-owned general contractor. Building great relationships since 1925. Location…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “WE Value People. WE Build Dreams.”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “W.E. O'Neil Construction - Since 1925”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.weoneil.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.weoneil.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,915 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.weoneil.com/llms.txt (7 KiB, 73 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 13 pages share a meta description

    https://www.weoneil.com/diversity-equity-inclusion-belonging, https://www.weoneil.com/contact, https://www.weoneil.com/company, https://www.weoneil.com/company/leadership, https://www.weoneil.com/company/employee-owned and https://www.weoneil.com/company/sustainable-building and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.weoneil.com/history, https://www.weoneil.com/company/news-insights and https://www.weoneil.com/projects have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.weoneil.com/company/employee-owned, https://www.weoneil.com/company/clients-partners and https://www.weoneil.com/company/sustainable-building took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://pixel.visitiq.io/dot/5f6f929c-7d80-4dd3-b1c0-f3ebbef8e385?cbust=2842930364676859.5&url_path=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weoneil.com%2F.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • A 20-field form

    Your longest form asks for 20 fields (3 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 438 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 438 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Media & News Join us throughout 2025” and “Learn More Learn More Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 23 testimonial or review blocks, 20 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at weoneil.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WP Engine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on weoneil.com, including 14 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25