Website review, no card needed
wga.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202630 issues · 76 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on wga.org, 13 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 107 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 113 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.4 s65 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.4 s.
Improve image delivery
3.9 s · 2.0 MB8 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.7 s · 616 KiB112 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (616 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 78 KiBAbout 78 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Unpkg and Adobe TypeKit and others), adding 349 KiB and 157 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 114 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 345 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 8.3 s
8.3 sThe first text or image appears after 8.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.0 s
20.0 sYour largest element takes 20.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “American French Film Festival Tickets”.
Time to Interactive: 20.0 s
20.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.3 s
8.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.24
0.24For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 94 ms
94 msReal visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 636 ms
636 msReal visitors wait 636 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 64 ms
64 msScripts block the page for only 64 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.4 MB in 124 requests
6.4 MBYour homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 5.0 MB (31), fonts 928 KiB (7) and scripts 293 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
784 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example IP.jpg at 1,440 px wide, shown at 300 px. Resized copies would save about 784 KiB.
14 images in older formats
14 images (3.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 216.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h3 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “Writers Guild of America West”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (207 characters)
Your meta description is 207 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.wga.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
125 internal links, 65 external
The homepage links to 125 pages on wga.org and 65 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “American French Film Festival Tickets”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.wga.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.wga.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (792 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.wga.org/members/membership-information/constitution, https://www.wga.org/members/membership-information/constitution/working-rules, https://www.wga.org/members/membership-information/international-members and https://www.wga.org/members/employment-resources/wgaw-project-page have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot set properties of null (setting 'textContent')”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 327 words of copy
The homepage carries about 327 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Schedule of Minimums”, “Start Button” and “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wga.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1933
- Headquarters
- New York City
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on wga.org, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.