Website review, no card needed
whitepages.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202625 issues · 100 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on whitepages.com, 5 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 191 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 195 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 88
88/100Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 345 ms
345 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 345 ms of main-thread work and 373 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
333 KiBAbout 333 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, reddit and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 462 KiB and 413 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
250 ms · 200 KiB25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (200 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 185 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Minify JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 714 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 8.6 s
8.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 959 ms
959 msReal visitors wait 959 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 338 ms
338 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 338 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 193 ms to 195 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 184 ms
184 msReal visitors wait 184 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.076
0.076The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.076, good is under 0.1).
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sYour largest element renders in 2.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “The trusted source for contact info & property data”.
Speed Index: 2.1 s
2.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.29 g of CO₂e: 34.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.0 MB in 57 requests
1.0 MBYour homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 57 requests on a phone: scripts 913 KiB (28), HTML 79 KiB (1) and images 29 KiB (7). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
52 tap targets too small
52 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (58 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 58 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
91 links without text
91 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
Meta description is long (303 characters)
Your meta description is 303 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.whitepages.com/main-site-hierarchy.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
348 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 348 pages on whitepages.com and 31 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The trusted source forcontact info & property data”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Whitepages: People Search, Phone Numbers & Addresses”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.whitepages.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,679 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (7 KiB, 43 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 broken images
3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://cs.media.net/cksync?cs=3&gdpr=0&gdpr_consent=&gpp_sid=&gpp_string=&ovsid=fe71908c-e408-416d-818b-ff1517f56b8c&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fids.api.gcprivacy.id%2Fv1%2Frt%2Fsync%2Fmedianet%3Fgcid%3Df.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Amplitude Logger [Error]: Failed to generate joined config: Error: No remote config received”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://property.whitepages.com/property-owner-search (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (whitepages.com).
Valid certificate (79 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for whitepages.com and is valid for another 79 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://whitepages.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
whitepages.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
whitepages.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearswhitepages.com was registered in Apr 1996 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
whitepages.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 7 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,475 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,475 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Sign Up”, “Kelly Call” and “API Pricing”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx a:zgateway.zuora.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:amazonses.com includ…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Amplitude, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
33 cookies set on arrival
33Opening the homepage sets 33 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
81 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 81 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 25 issues on whitepages.com, including 9 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.