Website review, no card needed

whiterabbitprojects.com logo

whiterabbitprojects.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202619 issues · 55 checks

This review found 19 issues worth fixing on whiterabbitprojects.com, 7 of them high impact, across 55 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.7 sMay 2Aug 222.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms76 msMay 9Aug 897 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202684 ms
May 16, 202685 ms
May 23, 202680 ms
May 30, 202680 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202684 ms
Jul 25, 202683 ms
Aug 1, 202689 ms
Aug 8, 202697 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of whiterabbitprojects.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. whiterabbitprojects.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. whiterabbitprojects.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. whiterabbitprojects.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. whiterabbitprojects.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. whiterabbitprojects.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. whiterabbitprojects.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. whiterabbitprojects.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. whiterabbitprojects.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

4 to fix59
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 500 KiB

    About 500 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 182 ms

    182 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 182 ms of main-thread work and 300 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, iubenda and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 639 KiB and 299 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 44 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 44 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 125 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    19 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    16 KiB

    1 image could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 86 but mobile only 59. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 465 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix66
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Your largest element takes 10.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PROJECTS”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 84 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 117 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.34 g of CO₂e: 40.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.2 MB in 33 requests

    1.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 33 requests on a phone: scripts 987 KiB (21), images 111 KiB (1) and fonts 101 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

100

Not measured in this review.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “White Rabbit Projects”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “WhiteRabbitProjects”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://whiterabbitprojects.com/index.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://whiterabbitprojects.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://whiterabbitprojects.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix63
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 42 words

    The homepage has only about 42 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more and customise”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at whiterabbitprojects.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 19 issues on whiterabbitprojects.com, including 9 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25