Website review, no card needed
windandsea.jp website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202636 issues · 78 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on windandsea.jp, 15 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #76,694 of 108,857 reviewed websitesbeats 26%
- #48,393 of 61,765 online storesbeats 18%
- #45,577 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 16%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 149 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
24.1 s · 8.6 MB12 images could be 8.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 24.1 s faster on a phone.
hcaptcha.com adds 5.5 s
5.5 shcaptcha.com costs a phone 5.5 s of main-thread work and 4.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Main-thread work: 13.6 s
A phone's processor spends 13.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (hcaptcha.com, Google CDN and customerfields.com and others), adding 5.7 MB and 6.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
320 ms · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 320 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 951 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google CDN adds 586 ms
586 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 586 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
customerfields.com adds 361 ms
361 mscustomerfields.com costs a phone 361 ms of main-thread work and 209 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
299 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (299 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
45 KiBAbout 45 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 39.4 s
39.4 sYour largest element takes 39.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 20.8 s
20.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 64.3 s
64.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 64.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 4.1 s
4.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 4.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 366 ms
366 msReal visitors wait 366 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 15.9 MB in 165 requests
15.9 MBYour homepage downloads 15.9 MB in 165 requests on a phone: images 9.0 MB (13), scripts 4.1 MB (77) and HTML 1.8 MB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
12 images far larger than shown
8.4 MB12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2_de3f09b4-6a92-422b-aa46-3d3e88217a96_1.jpg at 3,232 px wide, shown at 195 px. Resized copies would save about 8.4 MB.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 7.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images in older formats
2 images (3.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.5 g of CO₂ per visit
4.51 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.51 g of CO₂e: 541.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
16 form fields without a label
16 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “WIND AND SEA ONLINE STORE”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (182 characters)
Your meta description is 182 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
48 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 48 pages on windandsea.jp and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://windandsea.jp/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://windandsea.jp/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://windandsea.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://windandsea.jp/collections/all, https://windandsea.jp/collections/no-coffee-x-wind-and-sea, https://windandsea.jp/collections/taion-wind-and-sea-1, https://windandsea.jp/collections/2026a-w-tech-collection and https://windandsea.jp/collections/technics-parappa-the-rapper-wind-and-sea have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
https://windandsea.jp/collections/all, https://windandsea.jp/collections/originals, https://windandsea.jp/collections/no-coffee-x-wind-and-sea, https://windandsea.jp/collections/taion-wind-and-sea-1, https://windandsea.jp/collections/2026a-w-tech-collection and https://windandsea.jp/collections/technics-parappa-the-rapper-wind-and-sea have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://windandsea.jp/collections/all, https://windandsea.jp/collections/originals, https://windandsea.jp/collections/no-coffee-x-wind-and-sea, https://windandsea.jp/collections/taion-wind-and-sea-1, https://windandsea.jp/collections/2026a-w-tech-collection and https://windandsea.jp/collections/technics-parappa-the-rapper-wind-and-sea have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 64 words
The homepage has only about 64 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
7 short forms
7 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
35 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at windandsea.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Essential A B Testing · Powerful Form Builder · Helium Customer Fields · Langshop · Back In Stock · product-image-zoom.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify Hosted
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on windandsea.jp, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.