Website review, no card needed

wingd.com logo

wingd.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202633 issues · 80 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on wingd.com, 12 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.4 sMay 16Oct 313.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms91 msMay 16Oct 31116 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026103 ms
May 23, 2026100 ms
May 30, 2026106 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026106 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026110 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026102 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026101 ms
Sep 19, 202699 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 2026101 ms
Oct 17, 2026106 ms
Oct 24, 2026115 ms
Oct 31, 2026116 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wingd.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wingd.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. wingd.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. wingd.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. wingd.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. wingd.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. wingd.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. wingd.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. wingd.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

6 to fix60
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 555 KiB

    44 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (555 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 296 KiB

    About 296 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 283 ms

    283 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 283 ms of main-thread work and 425 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 616 KiB and 391 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 150 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    121 KiB

    2 images could be 121 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    48 KiB

    About 48 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 497 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 110 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    Your largest element takes 11.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “High power. High impact. An optimised propulsion solution, …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 22 images without width and height

    22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 76 ms

    76 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 76 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 88 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 88 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (55), scripts 780 KiB (16) and fonts 96 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    63 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example wingd_mette_2562_v1.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 63 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (100 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.72 g of CO₂e: 87.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8993
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 54 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9279
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (12 characters)

    Your title is only 12 characters: “Home | WinGD”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 131 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 131 pages on wingd.com and 9 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We are WinGD”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://wingd.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wingd.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://wingd.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (979 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://wingd.com/Careers, https://wingd.com/products-solutions, https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines, https://wingd.com/design-development/engine-technologies/x-df-dual-fuel-design, https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines/general-technical-data and https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines/fuel-flexibility and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://wingd.com/Careers, whose canonical is https://wingd.com/about-wingd/careers. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://wingd.com/Careers, https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines/general-technical-data, https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines/fuel-flexibility, https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines/fuel-flexibility/lng and https://wingd.com/products-solutions/engines/fuel-flexibility/ammonia took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 21 small tap targets

    21 of 41 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 13-field form

    Your longest form asks for 13 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 589 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 589 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Download” and “Subscribe now”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wingd.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Swisscom Switzerland Ltd

Hiring

Hiring
16 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Founded
2015
Headquarters
Winterthur

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on wingd.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25