Website review, no card needed
wintersbros.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202644 issues · 90 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on wintersbros.com, 20 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.7 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.6 s · 671 KiB37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (671 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.9 s
A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Adobe Tag Manager and Google Maps and others), adding 1.7 MB and 984 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 342 KiB5 images could be 342 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 159 KiBAbout 159 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 456 ms
456 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 456 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 256 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Maps adds 145 ms
145 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 145 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 62 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sThe first text or image appears after 9.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.0 s
22.0 sYour largest element takes 22.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WM and our vendors use cookies and tracking technologies to…”.
Time to Interactive: 23.3 s
23.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.7 s
9.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 902 ms
902 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 902 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 523 ms
523 msReal visitors wait 523 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.024
0.024The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.024, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.0 MB in 172 requests
4.0 MBYour homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 172 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (79), other files 476 KiB (42) and images 452 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (120 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (120 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.14 g of CO₂e: 136.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Required ARIA attributes must be provided (8 elements)
Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (2 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “Winters Bros. | A WM Company”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
11 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 11 pages on wintersbros.com and 1 external page.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.wm.com/us/en/winters-bros.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wm.com/merged-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.wm.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (600 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.wm.com/us/en declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
4 pages share 2 titles
https://www.wm.com/us/en/sitemap and https://www.wm.com/us/en/mywm/my-services/view-pickup-eta all use the title “WM”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.wm.com/us/en/sitemap, https://www.wm.com/us/en/terms/terms-and-conditions and https://www.wm.com/us/en/mywm/my-services/view-pickup-eta have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.wm.com/us/en and / use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.wm.com/us/en/sitemap and https://www.wm.com/us/en/mywm/my-services/view-pickup-eta have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.wm.com/us/en/terms/terms-and-conditions has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Minified React error #418; visit https://reactjs.org/docs/error-decoder.html?invariant=418 for the full message or use …”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
35 of 40 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 964 words of copy
The homepage carries about 964 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get A Dumpster Rental”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Schedule & ETA”, “Get A Dumpster Rental” and “Holiday Schedule”.
Privacy and tracking
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wintersbros.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Vercel
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on wintersbros.com, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.