Website review, no card needed
wioskisos.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202643 issues · 87 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on wioskisos.org, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 268 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.8 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Hotjar and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 32). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 154 KiBAbout 154 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 442 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google CDN adds 256 ms
256 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 81 KiB4 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
220 KiB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (220 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 23 KiB23 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 129 ms
129 msYour server sent the HTML in 129 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 27.6 s
27.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.6 s
9.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 345 ms
345 msReal visitors wait 345 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 89% slower for real visitors
+89%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 268 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 595 ms
595 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 595 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sYour largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Logo”.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
22 images without width and height
22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 616 ms
616 msReal visitors wait 616 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 45% faster for real visitors
-45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.4 MB in 204 requests
5.4 MBYour homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 204 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (63), images 1.5 MB (63) and other files 970 KiB (53). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
17 images below the first screen load straight away
17 images further down the page (841 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
4 images far larger than shown
190 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example jpg-na-strone-scaled-e1753792172542.jpg at 1,638 px wide, shown at 180 px. Resized copies would save about 190 KiB.
9 images in older formats
9 images (449 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.53 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.53 g of CO₂e: 183.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
39 text elements with low contrast
39 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (41 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 41 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is long (74 characters)
Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Strona główna - SOS Wioski Dziecięce w PolsceSOS Wioski Dziecięce w Polsce”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
80 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 80 pages on wioskisos.org and 20 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pomagamy dzieciom opuszczonym, osieroconym oraz zagrożonym utratą opieki rodzicielskiej.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://wioskisos.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wioskisos.org/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://wioskisos.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,326 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://wioskisos.org/praca, https://wioskisos.org/przetargi-publiczne, https://wioskisos.org/publikacje, https://wioskisos.org/projekty-unii-europejskiej, https://wioskisos.org/kim-jestesmy and https://wioskisos.org/jak-pomagamy and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages slow to respond
https://wioskisos.org/publikacje, https://wioskisos.org/projekty-unii-europejskiej, https://wioskisos.org/jak-pomagamy, https://wioskisos.org/statut-i-raporty, https://wioskisos.org/prawo and https://wioskisos.org/zadania-publiczne-2 and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 17-field form
Your longest form asks for 17 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,268 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,268 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wioskisos.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Employees
- 312
- Founded
- 1992
- Headquarters
- Warsaw
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on wioskisos.org, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.