Website review, no card needed

wis.edu logo

wis.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202649 issues · 94 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on wis.edu, 23 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s2.4 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms93 msMay 16Oct 31127 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026113 ms
May 23, 2026112 ms
May 30, 2026117 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026113 ms
Jun 20, 2026116 ms
Jun 27, 2026117 ms
Jul 4, 2026117 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026119 ms
Aug 29, 2026114 ms
Sep 5, 2026110 ms
Sep 12, 2026110 ms
Sep 19, 202698 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms
Oct 17, 2026125 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms
Oct 31, 2026127 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wis.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wis.edu at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. wis.edu at 2.8 s2.8 s
  3. wis.edu at 4.2 s4.2 s
  4. wis.edu at 5.6 s5.6 s
  5. wis.edu at 7.0 s7.0 s
  6. wis.edu at 8.4 s8.4 s
  7. wis.edu at 9.8 s9.8 s
  8. wis.edu at 11.1 s11.1 s

Speed

14 to fix11
  • Improve image delivery

    4.8 s · 3.2 MB

    24 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.5 s · 814 KiB

    About 814 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.6 s

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.

  • Font display

    3.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.4 s · 261 KiB

    About 261 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 319 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (319 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 11.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 11

    11/100

    Your mobile performance score is 11. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 3.7 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, amais.com and Vimeo and others), adding 15.7 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • amais.com adds 406 ms

    406 ms

    amais.com costs a phone 406 ms of main-thread work and 11.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Vimeo adds 274 ms

    274 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 274 ms of main-thread work and 3.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 490 ms

    490 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 490 ms of main-thread work and 510 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,681 HTML elements

    The page has 1,681 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    Real visitors wait 6.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.8 s

    23.8 s

    Your largest element takes 23.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL”. Most of its time is element render delay (9.7 s).

  • Speed Index: 19.9 s

    19.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 4.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.9 s

    23.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.279

    0.279

    The layout shifts by 0.279 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 127 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 747 ms

    747 ms

    Real visitors wait 747 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix28
  • Page weight: 15.9 MB in 220 requests

    15.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 15.9 MB in 220 requests on a phone: images 11.4 MB (126), other files 2.2 MB (36) and scripts 1.6 MB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 2.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 11 images far larger than shown

    2.4 MB

    11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Homepage_blog_pic-4761-optimized.webp at 2,560 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 2.4 MB.

  • 38 images below the first screen load straight away

    38 images further down the page (6.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (350 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.52 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.52 g of CO₂e: 542.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8192
  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 97 images without alt text

    97 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 95 links without text

    95 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9284
  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “Home | WIS”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Home | WIS” and “Home”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 289 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 289 pages on wis.edu and 13 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 109 characters

    Your meta description is 109 characters: “WIS is an exemplary learning community enriched by difference, informed through inquiry, and global in reach.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wis.edu/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wis.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wis.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,141 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 8 pages share 4 titles

    https://www.wis.edu/about-wis and https://www.wis.edu/mission-values all use the title “About | Who We Are | WIS”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.wis.edu/technology-at-wis has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 pages share a meta description

    https://www.wis.edu/calendars, https://www.wis.edu/about-wis, https://www.wis.edu/mission-values, https://www.wis.edu/meet-us, https://www.wis.edu/wis-leadership and https://www.wis.edu/board-governance and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.wis.edu/about-wis, whose canonical is https://www.wis.edu/mission-values. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.wis.edu/diversity, https://www.wis.edu/idi-community-spotlights, https://www.wis.edu/meet-us and https://www.wis.edu/wis-leadership took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 178 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 908 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 908 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Inquire”, “Apply” and “How To Apply”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wis.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1966

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on wis.edu, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25