Website review, no card needed

wts.edu logo

wts.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202649 issues · 95 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on wts.edu, 20 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 244.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.4 s
May 16, 20264.4 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.5 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.6 s
Jul 4, 20264.7 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20265.1 s
Aug 1, 20265.2 s
Aug 8, 20265.2 s
Aug 15, 20265.1 s
Aug 22, 20264.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20264.5 s
Oct 24, 20264.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
287 ms133 msMay 9Oct 24177 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026208 ms
May 16, 2026199 ms
May 23, 2026209 ms
May 30, 2026182 ms
Jun 6, 2026182 ms
Jun 13, 2026196 ms
Jun 20, 2026240 ms
Jun 27, 2026228 ms
Jul 4, 2026249 ms
Jul 11, 2026269 ms
Jul 18, 2026214 ms
Jul 25, 2026228 ms
Aug 1, 2026222 ms
Aug 8, 2026214 ms
Aug 15, 2026217 ms
Aug 22, 2026205 ms
Aug 29, 2026195 ms
Sep 5, 2026188 ms
Sep 12, 2026157 ms
Sep 19, 2026163 ms
Sep 26, 2026157 ms
Oct 3, 2026151 ms
Oct 10, 2026160 ms
Oct 17, 2026155 ms
Oct 24, 2026177 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wts.edu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wts.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wts.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. wts.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. wts.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. wts.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. wts.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. wts.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. wts.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

16 to fix37
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.4 s · 59.3 MB

    63 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (59.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    14.9 s · 2.8 MB

    About 2.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.9 s faster on a phone.

  • website-files.com adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    website-files.com costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 59.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.1 s · 230 KiB

    About 230 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 40). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,588 HTML elements

    The page has 3,588 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and Vimeo and others), adding 64.4 MB and 2.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Vimeo adds 238 ms

    238 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 238 ms of main-thread work and 3.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 424 ms

    424 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 424 ms of main-thread work and 636 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • privado.ai adds 228 ms

    228 ms

    privado.ai costs a phone 228 ms of main-thread work and 457 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 271 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • eventscalendar.co adds 85 ms

    85 ms

    eventscalendar.co costs a phone 85 ms of main-thread work and 315 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Improve image delivery

    129 KiB

    5 images could be 129 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Real visitors wait 4.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 46.0 s

    46.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 46.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 56.3 s

    56.3 s

    Your largest element takes 56.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A Time-Tested Curriculum In 1929 Westminster’s founder, J. …”.

  • Speed Index: 46.0 s

    46.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 46.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 63.2 s

    63.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 63.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 748 ms

    748 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 748 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 187 ms

    187 ms

    Real visitors wait 187 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 208 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 72.7 MB in 314 requests

    72.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 72.7 MB in 314 requests on a phone: media 58.2 MB (17), fonts 7.8 MB (85) and scripts 5.1 MB (68). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 20.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    20.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 20.62 g of CO₂e: 2474.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8388
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h3 → h6 and h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 169 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9273
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Westminster Theological Seminary | To Christ, Despite All, We Hold”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“TO CHRIST‍despite allWE HOLD” and “A Time-Tested Curriculum”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (203 characters)

    Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 112 internal links, 57 external

    The homepage links to 112 pages on wts.edu and 57 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wts.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://wts.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,492 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://wts.edu/contact-us and https://wts.edu/academic-study/programs have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 970 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 970 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY NOW” and “INQUIRE”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Apply Now” and “INQUIRE”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 74 testimonial or review blocks and 42 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wts.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Company

Employees
142
Founded
1929

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on wts.edu, including 26 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25