Website review, no card needed
x.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202627 issues · 63 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on x.com, 8 of them high impact, across 63 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 9.7 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 9.6 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 9.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 451 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 452 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 453 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 451 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 452 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 440 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 421 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 408 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 373 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 374 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 393 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 399 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 412 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 424 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 431 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 429 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.1 s.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 28 KiBAbout 28 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Twitter), adding 142 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 96
96/100Your mobile performance score is 96 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.1 s
A phone's processor spends 0.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 9 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.7 s
7.7 sReal visitors wait 7.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 499 ms
499 msReal visitors wait 499 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.24
0.24For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 451 ms to 429 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 49% faster for real visitors
-49%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 9.7 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sYour largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “See what’s happening”.
Time to Interactive: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe page is fully interactive after 2.4 s.
Speed Index: 2.0 s
2.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.04 g of CO₂ per visit
0.04 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.04 g of CO₂e: 5.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 159 KiB in 5 requests
159 KiBYour homepage downloads 159 KiB in 5 requests on a phone: fonts 86 KiB (3), stylesheets 56 KiB (1) and HTML 17 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “X. It’s what’s happening / X”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Happening now.” and “See what’s happening”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://x.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
9 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 9 pages on x.com and 12 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 109 characters
Your meta description is 109 characters: “From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://x.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://x.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://x.com/i/jf/onboarding/web is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://x.com/i/jf/onboarding/web has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://x.com/tos, whose canonical is https://x.com/en/tos. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://x.com/i/jf/onboarding/web has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 internal pages checked
We fetched 4 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 4 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 31 words
The homepage has only about 31 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at x.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on x.com, including 7 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.